

So you've decided to write a book. Whether you have something important to say, or are just incredibly bored, writing a book is a great way to waste months or years of your life indoors. I envy you as you set out on what is sure to be an incredible, mostly stationary voyage. The BasicsLet' start right from scratch. Webster' Dictionary defines a book as: Book (v.)To record charges against (a person) on a police blotter, e.g. "Take him downtown and book him" So there' that. In general, there are two types of books you can write: Fiction and Non-Fiction. I'll briefly cover the pros and cons of both. Fiction:Fiction is a Latin word meaning "stuff that never happened." Because you're writing about events that never occurred, you will be forced to make up everything yourself. This is very difficult to do. The pressures of creating their own universe has driven some writers to madness, as they find it difficult to distinguish between their characters and reality, much like an undercover officer who gets in too deep. If you're writing a story about undercover police work this danger is magnified tenfold.Consequently, very little of today' top fiction is written by a single person. For example, Michael Crichton is actually a rotating group of six to seven writers, aided by a priest and a small robot. I'm going to assume that you're not a team of people aided by a priest and a small robot, so I don't recommend you write fiction. Non-Fiction:A Latin word meaning, literally, "Not stuff that never happened." Here the writer is freed from the tedious chore of creating characters and reasons to care about them, and can simply write down things that have already happened. This is very easy to do. At first glance it would appear that the possibilities for writing non-fiction are endless, as there is a limitless expanse of human experience and history to write about. This is true only in the strictest technical sense; in practice, the only non-fiction books that are published anymore are criticisms of The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown. The Da Vinci Code and Dan Brown (right) The Actual Writing Bit. |
|
|
5 Corporate Promotions That Ended in (Predictable) Disaster
The 8 Most Insulting Attempts to Raise Money for a Cause
How to Solve The Healthcare Debate With Violence
How I Spent Last Night (According to Eye Witness Testimony)
Hello, nice site :)
Good point.. the people writing all these books criticizing Dan Brown are quite sad. But Chris, you're too frustrated/angry to be really funny.
Why Obama Makes Americans Want to Stockpile Ammo
The Men Who Stare At Goats: New Trailer
Curse of the Duck Hunt Dog
You know, the title of this article prompted me to expect something totally different, something less disjointed, more meticulous, and yes, less angry.
I think it would have been far more entertaining, and even, dare I say, informative, to have picked apart the various elements that Dan Brown puts into each of his novels (the Da Vinci Code is brilliant because it's a refinement of all these elements that he uses over and over, kind of like the Matrix doesn't really introduce anything new, but blows your mind by combining it all so well).
A short list, for starters (with a title like "How to Write a Bestseller in 10 Easy Steps":
1) Brilliant, action-oriented, yet professorial protagonist (hmm, Indiana Jones, anyone?)
2) Beautiful, yet equally brilliant, love interest (well, of course)
3) History-spanning, global conspiracy covering up mind-blowing truths (everyone loves a conspiracy, and as The Blair Witch Project proved, people are easily suckered into believing almost anything)
4) A deformed villain, to create a feeling of dangerous urgency
5) Puzzles - just clever enough that you hit yourself in the head and shout, "Why didn't I think of that?" when you read the answer
6) Chases through famous landmarks
7-10) Whoops, can't think of any more of the top of my head
Elaborating on each of these points, using the novels Da Vinci Code, Angels and Demons, Deception Point, and Digital Fortress, would be have fun to read and enjoy.