|
In case you haven't seen the ads framing Cracked.com these past few day, Family Guy starts back up tomorrow. Which is kind of strange when you consider that Fox canceled it almost 10 years ago. It's still on the air because the unwashed masses demanded it. In fact, the little guy has been increasingly making huge media companies his prison-wife thanks to the two most dangerous things in existence: incredible amounts of spare time and knowing how to use the Internet. #5.
The Internet Programs TV, Greenlights a Movie
Right at this very moment, you most likely have a device in your pocket that can show you your location from space, give you directions and reviews to your favorite restaurant, play a few rounds of virtual golf against a man in South Korea and stream whatever amateur fetish porn is currently floating your boat... and it can do all that within the next five minutes. And yet, most TV decision-making is based on Nielsen Ratings, which apparently consists of a small random sample of evil, inbred Nazis who rejoice in poisoning the zeitgeist with reality shows about fat people dancing for Brett Michaels' anal virginity (or whatever). But when they canceled Family Guy, the Internet made its presence known and massive online petitions and email campaigns led to the resurrection of the show on two separate occasions. If you're counting, that's one more than Jesus Christ. Then, in 2003, the Fox Network decided to cancel the most exciting new science fiction show in decades, Firefly.
Nerds suddenly felt like the entire world had turned upside down; it was like entering Jaynestown (that's 14 Nerd Points! We're going to level up into Geeks any minute now). Bespectacled women in brown trench-coats sobbed hysterically in the corners of darkened rooms, listening to "You Can't Take the Sky From Me" on endless repeat. And really, nobody else cared. They were just nerds, right? They're always whining about something. Ignore them, maybe throw them a Star Trek marathon or get a girl to talk to them or something; they'll go away.
But thanks to the word of mouth on the web, DVD sales skyrocketed; organized email campaigns flooded the networks and the show leapfrogged the entire medium of television, and became an actual big budget Hollywood movie. That's like being fired from Burger King and then getting re-hired as official blowjob tester for Ice Cream Island. #4.
Twitter Vs. Breaking News
Conventional news outlets have always treated the Internet like a foster parent treats their child at the supermarket: With thinly veiled disdain only kept from becoming outright physical abuse because people are watching. But that all changed last year, when Twitter scooped them all on the "Miracle on the Hudson" story with the above picture, two sentences and one fragment (if you wanna be a dick about it): "There's a plane in the Hudson. I'm on the ferry going to pick up the people. Crazy."
Suddenly, it became clear that when bad stuff happens, you don't always need Anderson Cooper on the scene to tell you about it. Not when every asshole in the world has a camera, a printing press and a worldwide distribution network in their pocket. Not a big enough story for you? Well, Twitter also scooped every news outlet in the entire world, and broke the history-making story that there is, in fact, water on the moon. That's right: That thing you use to update family members on the consistency and difficulty of your bowel movements? Yeah, that just broke the biggest story to happen on the moon since Neil Armstrong got flashed by a three breasted woman.
This all happened because Science Magazine, who were responsible for the ground-breaking research, wanted to announce their findings with the appropriate pomp and circumstance. There was to be a worldwide press conference attended by all the major news outlets, and an embargo was placed on reporting the story up until the conference. But as the scientific community went about gathering the trumpeters and confetti for their first major announcement in ages, Twitter was all "lol they found water on the mooooon, whuuuuuuuuuuut?!"
OK, so in reality it wasn't some random jerkoff, but a concentrated, amorphous movement. When they announced the press conference, Science Magazine made the mistake of announcing which scientists would be in attendance. The Internet, loving nothing more than to check facts (to the frequent chagrin of Cracked writers), figured out that the common denominator between all of the scientists was water on the moon, and just went ahead and made the announcement themselves. #3.
Newsweek Vs. The Drudge Report
There's nothing all that special about Twitter; it's just the latest service that illustrates the point. Before Twitter it was Facebook, before that it was MySpace, before that it was blogs. But the start of this trend is easy to trace. The Internet first started schooling conventional journalism all the way back in 1998, when Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff got word that special prosecutor Kenneth Starr was investigating political BBW Monica Lewinsky. Isikoff did extensive research. He dug through every lead, did all of his footwork and finally placed what he thought was the story of the year before his editors who promptly shut him down. This was probably because Lewinsky was "not a reliable source," but more likely because they didn't want to alienate their connections in Washington. But when the Matt Drudge got hold of this news, he--being big on the Internet in the late 90s--didn't have to worry about stuff like "destroying relationships" (blogging was still mom's basement territory back then) and so he freely covered the story with all the understated solemnity he's famous for:
We should probably just be thankful that he managed to restrain himself to appending it with five exclamation marks and a "1." In the past, if a major publication dropped a story, that was it. It would be swiftly swept under the rug and forgotten about. But thanks to one screaming Internet News Queen and his tenuous grasp of grammar, this story was dragged screaming (and probably still sticky) into the public eye, and became so important it nearly dethroned the leader of the free world. |
If Video Games Were Realistic
5 Awesome Cases of The Internet Owning The Mainstream Media
8 Online Fads You Didn't Know Were Invented Decades Ago
5 Plot Devices That Make Good Video Games Suck
It is sad that the only thing in this article I cared about was the ever so brief mention of Firefly...
Matt Drudge isn't ignorant of the rules of grammar, that's a stylistic choice in assembling headlines. Journalists tend to use gut-wrenching puns in their headlines for similar reasons.
I think an instance which deserves mention (if not top #5, then make the list top #6) is Jeff Goldblum's recent 'death'. http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/26/and-the-wankley-goes-to-richard-wilkins/ The real highlight was watching Jeff deliver his own eulogy when he found out he was apparently dead.
__http://www.MillionaireCupid.org__ is a community for those seeking interracial relationships, friendships, dating and more. Join now to meet your dream date in this comfortable community of cultures and ethnicities.
The man they call Jayne! Best Baldwin work ever.
@ Kelgo: I also am inclined to disagree, simply because as a Twitter user I follow my friends' tweets. The result is usually something along the lines of "Oh, Best Friend #1 disliked Gamer? Our opinions tend to sync up, maybe I'll ignore the fact that its a Girard Butler Movie and wait for Law Abiding Citizen". I believe Twitter, not because its some Anonymous (no pun intended) Authority with loads of followers, but because its my friends, and we usually agree.
@ Kelgo: I disagree. I lost interest in the movie after reading negative comments about it on ebaums.
@'banana?' Futurama is already coming back on the air, they're doing voice casting at the mo I think, to be shown on comedy central late next year.
Why isn't 4chan completely owing Time magazine's poll for Most Influential People Poll on here?
denis_robert, please look back up at the actual evidence in the Rathergate case. The so-called TANG doc*ment is a hoax; the type was actually from Microsoft Word, and the "authenticity" of the doc*ments themselves has been thoroughly debunked. The lamestream media "debate" which followed the genuine controversy was limited to the known idiot Mary Mapes and the other Extreme Left pundits ignoring what their own lying eyes were telling them in order to praise Rather at their parties (no joke). CBS was stupid enough to buy Killian's crap but not enough to try to cover for an obvious loser like Rather, and knew in the match-up against the bloggers they had already lost. All this has become clear to everyone but that rare contingent of idiots slightly to the left of Hugo Chavez since Rather's case against CBS got thrown out of court today, but there was already more than enough overwhelming evidence available just in that animated graphic up there to debunk you. So please get a life.
I don't think #1 is valid, as I don't think people will listen to someone else's opinion on a movie they want to see, whether he a movie critic of a "friend" on Twitter (or whatever the term used is).
I don't think 31
You've Leveled Up! Congratulations, you are now: Geeks!
#1 is almost true...except for that unfortunate business of S.O.A.P.
i wish the internet would get its act together and get futurama back on the air. now THAT would be using it for good.
I actually liked Year One, I thought it was pretty well done, and the jokes were funny(if not exactly normal Jack Black humor)... Okay, I just love biblical satire. There, I said it.
Good article, but I tend to see these events pointed out as exceptions rather than rules (possibly the author of the article's same reasoning). One very sad thing about the Internet (and yes I am well aware I am treating it like some sort of omniscient entity) is it's tendency to belittle/shout down/drown out anything remotely positive. It's like people are afraid that someone may actually find out that they're really not lawless badasses and that they actually really love their mums.
denis_robert suffers from Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS). Please get out of mom's basement every once in a while.
Please look back at the actual evidence in the so-called "Rathergate" case. The so-called "Word Settings" is a hoax; the type was actually quite authentic, and the authenticity of the doc*ments themselves has not been plausibly challenged. The CBS "investigation" which followed the made-up controversy was limited to asking Anne Coulter and other Extreme Right pundits what they thought (no joke). CBS was desperate to cover their own asses, and were scared into doing so by the White House itself. All this will become clear when Rather's case against CBS goes to court, but there's more than enough evidence available in the public domain to debunk this. So please do your homework.
YESS!!! INTERNET!! FUCK YEAH!!
The 5 Most Ridiculously Awful Computers Ever Made
The World of Tomorrow (If The Internet Disappeared Today)
A Review of the Pirated Copy of Windows 7 I Bought On eBay
6 Web How-To's That Are Apparently For Supervillains
The Men Who Stare At Goats: New Trailer
Curse of the Duck Hunt Dog
Copyright © 2005 - 2009 Cracked Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. CRACKED, CRACKED.COM and the "CRACKED" logo are trademarks owned by Cracked Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Digg
Del.icio.us
Fark
