6 Bullshit Facts About Psychology That Everyone Believes
Psychology is one of those subjects that everybody likes to think they know something about. We love to go around diagnosing our friends and co-workers, both to make sense of the world and to make ourselves feel like we're smarter than they are.
But like any science that makes its way into the pop culture, a lot of the "common sense" statements we hear every day are so wrong that they border on raving idiocy. Such as...

You always hear people talk about how "cathartic" an experience was and how much better they feel, or you'll hear them say things like, "If you keep your anger bottled up, one day you'll just snap!"
In fact the "about to go crazy because he can't express anger" character is a mainstay in television and movies (see that Simpsons episode where Ned Flanders finally loses it, and every movie where a renegade cop fires his gun into the air instead of unloading on the bad guy who just killed his wife).
Things like squeezing stress dolls, screaming into a pillow, hitting a punching bag and strangling a kitten are all practices that we've seen offered as healthy alternatives to walking up to the fish counter at Farm Fresh and drowning the clerk in the lobster tank.

A lot of actual therapies have been constructed around this idea, and they all basically encourage you to curb your anger by feeding a knuckle sandwich to a punching bag, to prevent you from doing the same to your boss. It makes sense, right? Why throw your wife against the refrigerator when the casserole she under-cooked will shatter to pieces in a much more literal, and satisfying way?
Why it is Bullshit:
Research says it doesn't work. Expressing your anger, even against inanimate objects, doesn't make you less angry at all. In fact, it actually makes you want to get pissed off. Imagine if Bruce Banner walked around all day looking for an excuse to hulk-out, but replace the embarrassing shredded pants with friends and loved ones who are legitimately terrified every time his favorite sports team loses.
See, we humans have these things called "habits." When we do something, and it makes us feel good, we want to do it again... and more often. This is why you don't see a lot of Buddhist monks throwing bricks through storefront windows on their path to enlightenment and Lifetime original movies spend more on broken casserole dishes than on acting. The rush of anger is addictive as hell, and letting yourself lash out as a means to control your anger is like drinking to control your urge to drink.

And that's bad news, considering there are lots of situations where you don't have an inanimate object to take it out on. If a person gets entrenched in the habit of beating the living shit out of an inanimate object every time they get upset, heads are going to roll if they can't excuse themselves from a meeting to go chokeslam the tank on the break room water cooler.

The "self-esteem" thing has been hammered into our brains for decades, based on the belief that high self-esteem types achieve more in school, make and keep more friends and, in general, function better as a member of society.
Pretty much every single high school movie is a huge proponent of this theory. The fat, dumpy pariah, tired of years of depressing abuse, digs deep down and discovers his/her own self-worth in time for the big dance/game/senior trip. Then the entire student body takes notice of this radical change and raises this loser up to the most popular kid in school (roll credits to a Green Day song).

Numerous training programs and self-help books take this idea and run with it; promising that building self-esteem is the key to overcoming obstacles and failure. Even elementary schools jumped on board and started giving self-esteem classes to kids, because as all Americans know, the key to happiness is constant rewards for little to no actual accomplishments.
Why it is Bullshit:
This seems to be one of those deals where they've confused correlation and causation. Rather than thinking, "Maybe kids with high self-esteem feel good about themselves because they get good grades in school and have lots of friends," they decided that it's the other way around, that they succeed because they have self-esteem. So they tried to teach people to feel good about themselves for no other reason than pure entitlement, figuring the actual reasons for feeling good about themselves would follow at some later date.
This results in some kids having too much self-esteem, a breed of human that scientists classify as "douchebag." [See Figure 1.1]

Figure 1.1
We're not kidding. Research shows kids who have an inflated sense of self-worth become aggressive when their sense of superiority is called into question, leading to a more damaging fall for little Billy when he realizes what a loser he is (whereas fat Ralph already knew himself to be a loser and is therefore immune to disappointment).
We're certainly not experts, but it would, you know, seem like the solution would be to teach the stuff that leads to success (like social and communication skills, better strategies at dealing with stress, etc.) and just let that lead naturally to success and thus self-esteem, rather than just bypassing all that and going right for the self-esteem part.
Mr. Miyagi didn't teach the Karate Kid to believe in himself. He taught him how to kick people in the fucking head.

Quick, go find an Internet article that mentions Scientology. Now check out the comments.

You will find almost universal agreement that anyone who participates in a cult (or, organized religion of any kind) is either weak, retarded or some kind of weaktarded combination of the two. We tend to associate cults with fanaticism, assuming that they are all made up of people that wear bed sheets and live in backwoods communes pissing in Dixie cups. Thanks to high profile, apocalyptic and/or suicide cults like the Branch Davidians and Heaven's Gate, we don't have much reason to think otherwise.
Why it is Bullshit:
Studies show cult members are just as intelligent, if not more so, than the general public. And around 95 percent of cult members are perfectly sane (when they join up, anyway), with no history at all of real psychological problems. They're not stupid, and they're not crazy.
Of course this only serves to make cults even scarier. How in the hell do these groups get people--who are every bit as sane and smart as your best friend--to join up?
OK, ask yourself this: Why do rebellious biker types all immediately go out and start dressing and talking exactly like other biker types?

Why did you do, well, every single thing you did in your teenage years?

As social animals we are hard-wired to want to belong to a group. It's a need as basic and real as hunger or sex. When we get cut off from our group--say we lose a job, or move to a new city, or break up with our girlfriend--we go a little crazy. Cults are very, very good at finding people in that exact moment of weakness, and saying exactly the right things. Those pamphlets that sound so corny and transparent to you, read like a glorious breath of fresh air to somebody caught in one of those rough spots.
So sure, when we're in our normal, stable state of affairs we like to imagine ourselves coolly shooting down all of the charismatic cult leader's stupid-ass claims with the power of pure critical thinking. But remember that the next time you're drunk dialing your ex-girlfriend in the middle of the night, or stalking her new boyfriend, sneaking into the parking lot where he works and pooping on the hood of his car.
If you can't remember ever doing something dumb and embarrassing because you were feeling lonely and rejected, well, either you're very young, or you were just too drunk at the time to retain the memory.
And once these people are in the cult they realize that, no, not all cult members wind up as part of some bizarre suicide ceremony. Most lead normal, successful lives.

And once they make friends with these normal, successful people, what are they going to do when they run into some smartass like the Internet commenters above, who talk about how only retarded sheeple believe that garbage? They stand up for the group, that's what.
It's not even about defending the beliefs at that point, it's about defending their friends. And mindlessly doing things because all our friends do them is pretty much 90 percent of what society is.

"Hey I'm heading down to the Crocs store, wanna come with?"








Goddamn why do the comments on every single one of the articles on this site have to be people whining or being f*****g rude??
ReplyIts not like the article is false information about you personally.
If you see false information, provide links that prove your argument and move on with your lives.
this was written by someone who has no intellect about psychology. this article is more biased and saturated with TYPE I error that it actually mimics the worst sides of the the psychology school of thought. way to go in representing all the thingsthat are wrong with any science/pseudo science due to 1. no research 2. stereotyping/heuristics of what certain things individuallly and 3. the use of folk wisdom (i.e. everything that the article writer heard in tv and movies about psychology) no real basis for scientific evidence
ReplyTo say the author "no intellect about psychology" its relatively pointless, uneducated, and rude.
Homeboy isn't claiming to be a psychologist. So dont criticize him like he did. its stupid.
he is writing an article composed of other peoples research not his own.
Go bag on his sources not him.
it is hilarious that in #3 when you talk about backmasking you provide a link that is backward masking that takes you to a wikipedia page about backmasking that says "not to be confused with backward masking.
Replyit's easy to see through all of this bullshit!!!
Replyi can never buy into the self esteem crap anyway, it makes people egotistical as f**k
Replythose self esteem freaks are total psychos! i trust my basic survival instincts over that bullshit "believe in yourself" fantasy.
Reply"either weak, retarded or some kind of weaktarded combination of the two"
ReplyI love the word weaktarded
I get unaroused boners in like every two or three hours, you can't judge somebody's sexuality based on boners, Iam a total heterosexual guy and I get boners while completing my Chemistry Homework or while doing Sciency stuff in my Chemistry lab and it has nothing to do with the fact that my Chemistry Teacher is a super hot bimbo!
Replyyou missed something in your whole sublimal message comment. there's another form of it that is used on tv shows and movies. product placement. Carrie Bradshaw is hip and awesome and she uses an iBook. the message they are trying to convey is that if you want to be hip and awesome like Carrie, you must get an ibook.
Replywhat's interesting is that Apple is in like 100 lawsuits with Samsung over a bunch of patents Samsung says Apple ripped off. the suits are about to actually go to court and Apple has supposedly demanded that the televisions in the court room be removed or replaced with a non Samsung tv because they don't want the jury given the subliminal message that the court favors Samsung
I took a lie detector test that somehow went horribly wrong and I ended up having to prove to a ton of people that I am in fact, not a replicant. It was a nightmare.
Reply"The main problem is that nothing in science says that "homophobia" is even a thing."
Reply*sigh* So much wrong with this sentence. Where to start? When people use the term homophobia, it's not used as a scientific term. For that matter no chemist is of the belief that a hydrophobic substance is actually afraid of water.
Then there's that whole "nothing in science" bit. Like there's this huge goddamned book called SCIENCE on looks into. Science is about observing the real world. In the real world there is hostility towards homosexual behaviour and those who practice it or are inclined to. People call this homophobia. These are observed facts. This is "a thing". Further evidence of this is when actual researchers refer to it as such. As for it being a clinical disorder, I've never heard anybody suggest such a thing.
For fucks sake man, you're a psych student. You shouldn't need to be told this shit.
The authors point is that "homophobia" is nothing more than a colloquialism, which also appears to be your point, yet you argue?
Though this article does address common false beliefs about Psychology, these are the beliefs of the uninformed mainstream. If you take even an intro-level Psychology course... all of these beliefs will be discounted. As for the homosexuality study mentioned... isn't it also possible that sexual orientation is not a dichotomous state? Bisexuals are the perfect example of this. I believe that sexuality exists on a continuum... So everyone is a little bit "gay," some more than others. Someone who would normally be considered heterosexual, for example, is capable of feeling sexual arousal towards the same sex, whether they are conscious of it or not.
ReplyIt not only lies on a continuum, it is rather more plastic than most people will admit.
i have the weirdest boner right now...
Reply...Im gonna go watch some gay porn now.
ReplyMy boner is in the negatives when I watch gay porn, I get an anti-boner when I watch gay porn, my boner can take the shape of a pretzel when I watch gay porn, my boner leaves the room when I watch gay porn, naw I'm just kidding all that was a lie, I've never even seen gay porn
ReplyI'm sorry, i stopped reading after you said you get boners to gay porn.
lmao @ you
Congratulations I guess?
To former cult leader Jeff Lundgren:
ReplyBURN IN HELL!!!
While I was in college I wrote papers like this, only I at least let everyone know I was trying to be funny. Stuff like "if women have been oppressed sexually, and if serial killers tend to act out of frustration, why are women not frustrated sexually to a degree that most women would be serial killers?
ReplyI really do NOT want to sound like I'm spouting "truth" to enlighten. I just want to make people qualify their opinions. Most of these opinions are rumors and sophomore level theories which need to be developed more before they are published.
I like to apply #1 to all politicians who scream out their views such as "family man" and such, and then laugh when it turns out they have a mistress.
ReplyNot all politicians are like this of course, but I've seen it more often that I've wanted.
"All-told, nearly half of their total test subjects got at least semi-hard watching the gay porn. So... half the male population is secretly gay? That seems fairly unlikely." To help you qualify your argument a bit better, you may want to look up something called 'bisexuality'. While you're at it, I suggest also looking up 'bi-curious'. The test results can be criticized in several ways, but for your own sake, at least aknowledge the existence of bisexuality while you try seeming smarter than the researchers.
ReplyIt seems to me that many people forget sexuality is a gradient- sure some people are "completely" straight or "completely" gay but most people fall somewhere in the middle. Sure it might be very close to one end of the spectrum over the other for the majority of the population, but sexuality is in no way binary.
Here's the real number one myth about psychology that everyone believes: I took some psychology classes/I am a psychologist therefore I know your thoughts motives better than you do.
Reply