'Avatar' Is Horribly Written, Way Too Long, Totally Worth It

By Bobby "Fatboy" Roberts Dec 12, 2009 239,433 views
article image

I'm Going to See Avatar. What do I need to know?

#1. The movie is almost three hours, so if 3D makes you want to yack, bring a paper bag. Or go see it in 2D, where you won't have the benefit of the guy next to you going "My god, it's full of stars" to distract you from the basic plot and the really, REALLY shitty dialog (this is the man who wrote all of Edward Furlong's snappy slang in Terminator 2 after all).

#2. Get thee from the theater once the end credits start to roll, because the song that plays over them is dogshit and will damage your ears irreparably.

#3. If Discovery Channel documentaries like Walking With Dinosaurs and Planet Earth don't float your boat, the first 90 minutes of Avatar is going to bore the hell out of you.

Uh... what? Discovery Channel?

Yeah. Even after a decade trapped in a metal bubble filming starfish in IMAX, Cameron hasn't exactly gotten that documentary jones out of his system, and the first half of Avatar is basically a 90 minute travelogue. Granted, he's taking you on a tour of a completely imaginary, mindbendingly beautiful world, but nonetheless, the first hour of the film feels less like a narrative and more like a turbocharged episode of Meerkat Manor.

So, he finally did it. The King of the World finally fell on his face?

Nope! I'm not going to call it a "Game-Changer" like so many critics have, since pop-culture analysis shouldn't include phrases Herm Edwards would use. But there is more than a kernel of truth to the notion that Cameron has once again advanced the art of visual effects way beyond what people previously thought possible. And the episode of Meerkat Manor that he shot with this technology is a damned good one. Dry, but engrossing enough to get you through to the moment where the kitty people have sex--

Oh god...

--and then the film becomes a bugfuck-insane adaptation of Dances With Wolves.

OK, you're fucking with me, right?

Again, no. The plot goes like this: Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) is a dumb, crippled jarhead. He is unfit for the task he is inheriting from his recently deceased older brother; Working with a team of scientists on the surface of the planet Pandora to harvest a very valuable metal called Unobtanium (Yeah, just wait it gets worse ...). The natives on this planet are the Na'vi, (... not yet ...) affectionately referred to as "Thundersmurfs" by the internet intelligentsia, a 9 foot tall cat people with a deep, spiritual connection to nature. Since James Cameron is writing this, it's a literal connection - there are fiber optic looking threads that stick out of their cat ponytails that can connect with trees, plants, and the six-legged wildlife of Pandora.

Jake is asked to infiltrate the tribe living in a giant tree directly above their Unobtanium haul.

Jake is more than happy to do so, mostly because he's a dumbass, but also because it means he gets to inhabit an Avatar: A cloned body of a Na'vi that he can operate from inside a tanning bed.

While Jake's in the jungles of Pandora, a giant space-panther almost eats him, but he's saved by a Na'vi girl named Ney'tiri ...

Oh Goddamnit, when will somebody stop letting James Cameron make up words?

Not this year, apparently. Anyways, Ney-tiri also happens to be a princess. Jake, now with the use of his legs and literal pussy to chase, goes native, undergoing the trials of Na'vi warriorhood and falling in love.

This is not appreciated by the company's military leader, a man so masculine that just looking at him makes Nick Fury's third eye cry. Commander McBadass is basically itching for an excuse to wipe these cats from the planet with massive gunships and gun-toting, knife wielding mechwarriors. There is tragedy, there is victory, there is aforementioned kitty-sex and noble sacrifice and important lessons learned about protecting the environment and respecting other cultures that won't in any way be used as a brickbat to score political points on some blowhard AM talk-show.

Fuck politics. Does shit get blowed up good or what?

And how, motherfucker. And how.

Unfortunately, before that happens, you're asked to buy into the romancing of Ney'tiri. It's the Titanic plan all over again - the guys will get their action and their spectacle, but they've gotta finish all of the romance on their plate first. Avatar's probably worse than Titanic on this note, and that's saying something considering what a slog the first 90 minutes of Titanic was.

But at least I'm not just staring at girls in corsets crying on a boat right?

Right. You're staring at some the best CGI ever seen on screen, period. I never quite bought the Na'vi, mostly because of their goofy design, but the uncanny valley that plagues Zemeckis' creepy cybercreatures is nowhere to be found here. These are amazingly, realistically expressive 9 foot tall Cat Warriors. The (unearned and forced) emotion Cameron asks the audience to feel for these natives is there on their faces, in their body language, in a way not seen since Gollum had a bitch session on a tree stump in 2002. This is Cameron's head, emptied onto the screen with more love and care than he's shown to any of his previous films.

So I'm watching James Cameron's brain explode for 3 hours?

Exactly. 2009 has been a year of oddly personal directorial statements across the board. Fantastic Mr. Fox nicely summarized everything that makes Wes Anderson what he is as a director, as was the Coen Bros A Serious Man, and for better or worse, Michael Bay's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. For all the faults that Avatar displays, and it displays a lot of them, there's something charming about Cameron excitedly showing off every last personal kink, tweak and obsession that pops his geek boner.

He's like an eager 12 year old genius, gushing about his science project. The storytelling is basically Dune, Lord of the Rings and Star Wars badly glued together, but it almost doesn't matter because he believes so hard in this earnestly silly pastiche, that it's a little adorable. It never means as much as he thinks it does when he starts killing his playthings and setting their world on fire, but it's a marvel nonetheless.

Just tell me if Cameron remembers how to do an action sequence.

Dude.

DUDE.

HOLY. FUCKING. SHIT.

That good?

For all the things Cameron has done onscreen to write and rewrite the modern action sequence time and again in Terminator, and then ALIENS, and then T2, and then True Lies, until the last 40 minutes of Avatar, there's never been a James Cameron aerial battle, all swooping and banking and pew-pew in grand Lucasian style circa 1977. And then he does it, and it is fucking glorious to behold. It's the opening of Revenge of the Sith, and the end of Return of the Jedi, and the powersuit fight from ALIENS and the battle for the bridge in Saving Private Ryan, as seamless as the love story is not, using the best special effects ever.

So it's worth it, then.

Your enjoyment of that last 40 minutes will depend on how much of the preceding 2 hours of shoddy storytelling, dialog, and characterization you want to hold against Cameron. Either you'll be carried away by the man's technical skill and naked enthusiasm to show you probably the most personal thing he's ever created, or you'll fidget uncomfortably and fight down inappropriate snickers. But he will grab you in that last 40, and he will remind you that yeah, he's been away for awhile, and he may not have ever been the King of the World, but when he wants to, he will kick any other director's ass at the art of ass kicking.

Check out Bobby's analysis of another special effects extravaganza, '2012' Sucks Worse Than the Mayans Could Have Predicted, or his look at The 5 Most Unintentionally Racist Movies About Racism.

Show Profanity  
140 Comments

I disagree. The story was something we've seen before far too many times, the acting was meh, the only person I actually liked seeing on screen was sigourney weaver and they had the nerve to kill her off. CGI does not a good movie make.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 7/25/2010 10:40 AM
Hydrall

I'm glad to see there are people who agree with me. Besides a South Park episode which really isn't about the film, I haven't seen a single negative review or talked with anyone who disliked it.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/16/2010 4:54 AM
15wordsforsnow

This was the article that led me to Cracked. And I still freaking love it.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/8/2010 8:44 PM
Kaori242

The author is right and we'll never repeat it enough: "Avatar" is yet another avatar of "Dancing with wolves", just like the Last Samurai, minus that Tom Cruise d*****t. And oh, the predictability! What I can forgive from a nice kid movie like "How to train your dragon" (whose 3D was better rendered imo), I won't allow to a blockbuster that pretence.

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/8/2010 6:07 AM
VKayed

You really just don't enjoy sitting down and enjoying movies, do you?

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:31 PM
SeanDimitri

Honestly Avatar basically reverse grew on me. I came out of the theatre going OH MY GOD THAT WAS THE MOST AWESOMEST THING IN THE HISTORY OF AWESOME. And then I thought about it... went back over the plot... And then realized that it was a flaming pile of s**t (except for the battle scene, which is still rather awesome). It went so sour I cheered when it lost Best Picture to the Hurt Locker. So, in conclusion, Avatar blows.

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/7/2010 8:09 PM
FadingMind

I was the exact same way, I did a fist-pump when it lost to the Hurt Locker.

Posted on 5/11/2010 2:30 PM
RustyVenture

To be fair, Hurt Locker was the polar opposite of Avatar. Practically no budget, no-name actors, a woman directing (for a war movie?).

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:32 PM
SeanDimitri

avatar was terriable, i didnt want to see it and was forced to go, it was worst then i thought, i actually like movies with plotline and good acting, i relize the cgi was "amazing" but still, ill look at cool photos on the internet instead.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/7/2010 1:04 PM
adreemyers75

There is so much haterism happening here it's sad. Fatboy why don't you get off of James Cameron's nuts. I mean seriously you couldn't be jocking his dick any harder even if he paid you to. You sound like a whiny b***h. Get over it

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 3/8/2010 10:46 PM
theharlster

I have to agree with you. For someone who hated the movie so much, he sure has a whole hell of a lot to say about it. I mean come on, you wrote damn near a book about how much you hated it. If you didn't like the movie, then move on with your life. If you did like the movie, then good for you. One way or another, this essay did not persuade me to hate the movie, so if thats what your intentions were, you were wrong. You sounded like an idiot who has nothing better to do with your life, than to crack on a movie. JUST MY OPINION, but I guess you had your's too.

Posted on 7/13/2010 8:18 PM
AdrianHarris

The SFX were not that great. The rendering was haphazard at best... in 5 years when everyone gets over "omgwtfbbq NEW AND SPARKLY!" they will look back at it and realize it didn't hold up well.

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 3/5/2010 12:27 PM
sweetalker

Normally, I consider a pisspoor response, but for you it's adequate - if you can do better, by all means, please demonstrate.

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:33 PM
SeanDimitri

Alltho I disagree with most of this article (aside from the movie being totally worth it) I have to say, the internet sure seems to hate this movie :p

The CGI was awesome, sure it wasn't original and even less original then most movies in terms of raw story line but it had alot more going for it then just the CGI and the 3D :)

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 3/3/2010 6:21 PM
predikari

It's cool to hate something so popular.

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:34 PM
SeanDimitri

Oh, cmon... the alien kitten porn was not that bad, was it? Alright IT WAS. When I saw those 10-feet tall thundercats mating - and very much like we humans do - I almost laughed out loud in the theater, shouting "holy sh*t dude, they f*ck just like us!!"

The special effects were alright... I wonder what a mountain of crap Pandora would look like had the movie been shot 15 years ago, when Cameron wrote the plot.

And to hell with all that idillic "mother nature" sentimentalism. The best character in the movie was Colonel Duke Nukem - he needed an entire ship just to carry his balls, and each of his nuts were bigger than all the other character's combined.

3 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/11/2010 10:47 AM
murilo_silva

Finally someone else noticed the "subtle" Duke Nukemesque design of the Colonel

Posted on 3/12/2010 11:57 AM
riotartsquad

Duke Nukem by way of Chip Hazard. He even had a bunch of (blue) Gorgons to fight.

Posted on 4/16/2010 4:19 PM
zootsutra

District 9 >>>>>>> Avatar.

I didn't hate Avatar, I just don't think it is as good as everyone else thinks it is.

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 2/6/2010 5:06 PM
DR_Fronkensteen

Amen!

Posted on 2/8/2010 11:10 AM
alexoblivion

What was it..something like $20M to make the movie and it still had a GODDAMN FIGHTING ROBOT IN IT!!!

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:35 PM
SeanDimitri

The action scenes at the end sucked... I laughed through the whole thing, as unrealistic as it can get, it was ALL showing off with no logic behind anything at all. And that was after I had watched the rest of the movie which was just as bad.

At least it gave me a good laugh...

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/28/2010 11:42 PM
Maggadan

I agree - the action scenes were tedious, lengthy, and predictable. To compare them to the stunning setpieces of T2 is a farce. Visually I enjoyed the luminescent garden scenes the most - the dialogue and acting was terrible.

Posted on 2/27/2010 3:09 PM
feedingear

@feedingear - Comparing it to...T2? You're s**tting me? That was a good movie, but not even on the same level.

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:36 PM
SeanDimitri

I admit nothing

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/26/2010 6:53 PM
MartyrMachine

i think that the people who are saying the movie sucked just are saying that for attention since everybody loves it, and it is pretty much humanly incapable to hate this movie. stop whining, you know you liked it.

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/19/2010 1:37 PM
mateeah

No, it actually was s**t. Bland plot, bland acting, bad development...
Visuals aren't the only things that make movies. Come ten or twenty years, no one is going to remember Avatar because graphics and all will become much much more advanced than what we have now and since the core is so utterly limp, the plot won't be remembered either.
Mateeah, being honest now, can you recall a single character's name? How about the names of any part of the scenery?

Posted on 3/20/2010 3:33 PM
madeupfred

@madeupfred - People said the same thing of Titanic and people are still holding it in high regard...13 years later. I didn't like either movie myself, but to say Avatar was "forgettable" at best speaks more for your attention span than most peoples'.

Posted on 7/14/2010 10:37 PM
SeanDimitri

talk all your shiett , all Camerons gotta say bout his Avatar haters is , 1.3 billionn n***aa and goingg . Titanic first , Avatar second , let the results talk the shiett . Raww moviee , go get laidd cuzz . hollaa at me , yeeee , oneeee .

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/12/2010 8:14 PM
gspittttfireeee

That may have been one of the the most obnoxious comment I've ever read.

And THAT'S saying something.

Posted on 2/8/2010 10:15 AM
Cpt.Awesomeface

May you die in a way you deserve; beaten to death by English textbooks.

Posted on 5/7/2010 3:25 PM
Thungoda

Avatar was to long and to predictable, it was the war against the native americans all over only this time we side with the natives. but it was very dazeling in with it graphics and all

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/8/2010 6:29 PM
Bringmann

i saw this movie it was awesome seriously totally worth it all tho is the same story as in tarzan, planet of the apes etc but taken to a hole new level i really enjoined it

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 1/1/2010 1:10 PM
klayb

District 9 was better.

3 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 12/31/2009 6:57 AM
Sabre_Justice

Uh no. Just no.

Posted on 3/8/2010 10:42 PM
theharlster

District 9 had badass amazing alien guns, and used them for all of 5 minutes. Assholes.

Posted on 5/7/2010 3:27 PM
Thungoda

Movie synopsis:
Cowboys = bad, Indians = good!; capitalists = greedy SOBs; sticks + stones + mother nature >> modern weaponry; love with 9ft tall blue cat bimbo = freaky good!; following orders = bad, rebelling and killing former comrades = good; earth = bad, pandora = awesome!

What a bunch of shit, I want my $9.50 back. Cool effects, though.

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 12/30/2009 10:26 PM
defiant1

Yep.

Posted on 5/7/2010 9:06 PM
sleeepy2

great review fatboy, i'll be looking to read more from you, msgcocci. thanks

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 12/30/2009 5:40 PM
msgcocci
Cracked stuff on
cms page tracking