6 Popular Monsters Myths (That Prove Humanity Is Doomed)
If you don't believe in monsters, you're part of a tiny minority of humans. Pretty much all of the cultures on Earth have believed in monsters for most of their history and, even stranger, they all believed in the same monsters. We recently pointed out that every culture has some variation of the vampire legend and that's true of all the standard monsters--zombies, werewolves, etc.

Mexico's werewolves leave much to be desired.
But why? Well, it has to do with the wiring of the human brain, the evolution of cultures and, most importantly, the fact that people are dicks. All of which may spell bad news for the human race...

Zombies were inadvertently invented by a nameless stray dog, thousands of years ago.
I'm not kidding.
Been Around Since...
"I shall raise up the dead and they shall eat the living... I shall make the dead outnumber the living."
Where do you think the above line comes from? George Romero? That one movie about the army of Nazi Zombies?
It's from an ancient Babylonian epic that was written five thousand years ago. It's one of the oldest written works we know about. So forget about Night of the Living Dead or even the old Haitian Voodoo zombie priests. Zombies go way back. There's even a zombie army in the freaking Old Testament.
Which brings us to that random stray dog.
Experts think that back before we even had such a thing as stories or even language, the whole idea of resurrected undead came when some dog sniffed some rotting meat a few inches under loose soil: a recently-buried body. The dog digs up a hand, chews on it a bit, then runs off when he hears people coming. The people show up, see a single hand jutting up from the dirt and run like hell. "He's coming back! SHIT!"

Thousands and thousands of years later, you'll see that exact same image on the covers of zombie novels and movie posters: the rotting hand, clawing up from the ground. It's stamped into our consciousness.
For the Love of God, Why?
People back then already suspected the dead were a bunch of douchebags because anyone who hung around rotting, oozing corpses tended to get sick. Not knowing what microbes were, they declared the dead (and areas where the dead hung out) to be "cursed" or "haunted." So already people knew corpses were something to be afraid of.
But people who study things like zombies say there is a psychological element; that seeing humans turned inhuman raises some really awful doubts about human nature. What if all of the things we think make us human--our thoughts, our feelings for our loved ones--is all pointless bullshit? After all, even insects live, eat, have sex and build things, and they do it all without "minds" or "souls" or even a simple high-five to celebrate a job well done. So all that stuff we think makes us special... what does it matter?
So, when confronted by a human who's been transformed into a mindless, shambling predator, the terror is in the sneaking suspicion that we're looking into a mirror.

Jesus. Let's pause for a boob break.
But then you have to take into account...
The "People are Dicks" Factor:
Of course, when we fear that humans are, at bottom, nothing more than mindless animals, what we really mean is other people are mindless animals.
So what happens is zombies now get used as symbols for every group we fear and hate. It's no secret that Romero used zombies to symbolize the communist hordes in his first movie, and mindless consumers in his second. Today, Resident Evil makes zombies the foot soldiers of an evil corporation and mad scientists. All of it plays to the "us vs. them" theme, "us" as the "real," thinking and feeling humans; zombies in the role of "them," ie whatever group of immoral rabble is destroying the world this week.

Also, as we've pointed out before, zombies are the last enemies that are considered politically correct to slaughter. In an era when we're even supposed to feel guilty about killing robots (I, Robot) and aliens (The Day the Earth Stood Still), we'll give up our right to splatter zombie brains when you pry it from our cold, dead fingers.

Not only does every culture have some variation of the vampire, they're so freaking popular right now that you could start a damned religion around them. Hell, somebody probably already has.
Been Around Since...
Let's put it this way: There are shards of ancient Persian pottery depicting blood-sucking creatures. That pre-dates all written records, folks.
But the more specific "dead guy rising from the grave to suck blood" vampire (and in fact, the word "vampire") comes from Eastern Europe folklore, where they combined fear of blood suckers with the always-present fear of the reanimated dead (yes, the vampire also probably owes its invention to that same fucking dog).

He is currently owed $40-billion in royalties.
For the Love of God, Why?
Vampires were considered a separate species from the zombie thanks to the fact that no two corpses rot in exactly the same way. Sometimes the skin flakes off in such a way as to leave the remaining skin looking smooth and undamaged and gases from decomposition can cause the body to inflate, giving the appearance of being fat or healthier than they were at death. Also, skin tightens around fingernails and hair, so it looks like it has grown. Dig one up and you'd get the impression it had just spent the night roaming the countryside.

Cracked.com Legal reminds you that this site does not officially
encourage readers to fact-check this article by unearthing a corpse.
But why would they dig it up in the first place?
Diseases like tuberculosis and bubonic plague were rampant. They would rip apart the lungs and make the corpse bleed at the mouth. So you have a village where suddenly everyone is dying of the same symptoms, seemingly "drained" of their life or energy, and here's this bastard in his coffin, obviously faking death, with goddamned blood around his mouth! Put a stake through his heart already!
But then, in an awesome twist that no one could have predicted, the idea of the vampire kind of gave people a boner. Sexy stories emerged of handsome, powerful vampires exchanging body fluids by sucking on the necks of hot women. There's another few centuries of popularity for you. Today you can watch an episode of True Blood right until the screen is obscured by your erection.

A True Blood vampire "attack."
The "People are Dicks" Factor:
Hey, remember how they tended to blame diseases on vampires? It turns out many of our superstitions stem from the first rule of human dickery: Everything bad has to be someone's fault. Thus you have the 18th Century vampire panics--the vampire version of the witch hunts when a whole lot of accused vampires were hunted and killed (though the body count was not as high as the witch hunts, thanks to the somewhat hilarious fact that many of the accused were corpses).
Of course they have the same "humans as predators" appeal as zombies, but with the added twist that it makes being a vampire seem kind of awesome. The message of the vampire is that in order to achieve absolute power, we must treat our fellow humans as prey. And as others have brilliantly pointed out, most of us only hate the idea if we think we're on the "prey" side of that equation.
Wait... what does it say about us that the vampire is now pretty much our main pop culture hero?

I think it says we're dicks.

We're not talking about modern day Wiccans here. We're talking about this:

Warts, green skin, riding on a broom, owns a cauldron. Honestly, who the fuck came up with that combination? A broom? Why a broom?
The answer is far weirder than you think.
Been Around Since...
Talk of black magic spells that can cause sickness or death, and people who cast them, goes back to ancient Babylonia which again means it goes back as far as the written words. So we're talking thousands of years before the Witch Hunts that happened in Europe.
For the Love of God, Why?
None of it would likely have happened if anyone had a microscope.
Remember how we said vampires wound up the target of a "blame game" when disease outbreaks struck? No one got it worse than witches.
The way sickness had the ability to hop invisibly from household to household--even when the members avoided direct contact--was once considered absolute proof that dark magic existed. And as we have already established, someone had to be blamed, since blame is the only thing that makes us feel better in anxious times. But why did they take it out on (usually female) witches instead of, say, fat guys? Well...

Etching of a witch trial about to be interrupted by a motorcycle.
The "People are Dicks" Factor:
First, we wound up with the warty, green-skinned Halloween decoration-slash-Wizard of Oz villain we call a witch today because at some point we combined the "witch" with the "hag" or "crone"; ugly, old, cackling women who have turned up in scary stories going back millennia. In societies where women were considered worthless if they weren't bearing children, old women (and especially widows) were basically hated. So, they got cast as villains.
And why do they ride broomsticks? Well, one (awesome) theory is that women used to use broomsticks to take hallucinogenic drugs through their vaginas.
No, really. Some historians say the practitioners of witchcraft were using hallucinogenic plants like mandrake and belladonna to perform their "magic," and even believe they were flying. Such drugs work best when applied to the thin skin of mucus membranes... like the labia. So the story goes the "witches" would apply their "magic potion" to their broom sticks and "fly."

Kid! No!!
If you think all of this points to a really low opinion of women, you've basically figured out where witches come from. It really all comes down to good old-fashioned misogyny: men demanding utter dominance in the society, and hating--hating--the mysterious power that women (ie, boobs) have over them.
Thus a famous 15th Century witch-hunting manual warns that women are more susceptible to the dark arts because they're naturally weaker. They're also fond of tempting men into sin and naturally, witchcraft gives them the power to magically steal men's penises (it doesn't take Freud to puzzle that one out).
Another writer back in the day claimed that women performed witchcraft by strategically withholding sex. And by "back then" I of course mean a famous televangelist said that last month.
If that's not up-to-the-minute enough for you, on the day this article was written five accused witches were stripped, beaten and forced to eat human feces in India. Uh, yeah. Not so easy to make a Halloween decoration out of that.








Ugh...why is misogyny blamed for SO DAMN MANY things? Why do so many people feel such a burning need to demonize men as sexist? You obviously didn't do enough research, because if you had, you would've found out that MEN WERE BURNED AS WITCHES, TOO. In fact, men accused of witchcraft were more likely to be found guilty than women, and if found guilty, received far harsher punishments.
ReplyLet me ask you this: What reason, in all the cosmos, could men POSSIBLY have to discourage women from having sex with them?
Hey, I *like* the Underworld series..
ReplyAlso want to watch "The Fourth Kind" now.
Why was there a f*****g horse in that picture of the green rape demon?
Replyit's a "night mare".
I can't tell if you're joking, because that actually makes more sense than any explanation I can come up with (that horses are perverts, or that the artist really, really wanted to believe that horses are perverts)
What about Jonathan Taylor Thomas?
ReplyI think vampires are all about sexual jealously. Dracula was just a story about 2 guys who got married, lost their women to a sexier, stronger man, and then burned his house down and murdered that wife stealing SOB. Vampires are about the fear that our loved ones will leave for someone more attractive. In that context, its also easy to see why people fantasize about being vampires.
ReplyWell, that's the over-simplification of the day.
I think vamps had more to do with the idea of rape (which is what I got out of Bram Stoker's tale) more than anything else.
There's also the whole "virginity" thing that's going on with our more modern vampire tales.
I'm on board with believing in extraterrestrials but the issue humanity always seems to have with the idea is that they always give these aliens humanoid characteristics. We only look like we do because it was the most efficient way to adapt to our environment. Same goes for our civilization, interests, actions, thoughts and even our most outlandish fantasies. On an alien world they may have evolved into something inconceivable by the human imagination because their environment may be radically different for them. Instead of having ears and eyes they may have evolved and incredibly complex form of perception. Another is how people always think they're more technologically advanced than us, who knows, they may be extremely primitive and maybe even have no society at all and instead of building sophisticated space ships they are able to traverse the void of space unaided. And I agree with how the whole "us vs. them" idea shapes our imaginations because almost unfailingly aliens are some evil race of monsters hell bent on wiping us out but what if in their eyes we are the hideous convoluted monsters? There are just so many things to consider that the human mind's limitations cannot conceive.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesGiven the rough idea of the 'habitable zone', though, there are fairly good odds that at least one other species will be both sentient and humanoid.
Speaking of outlandish fantasies...
Do you know how we came to define a "habitable zone"? We took a look at the life-forms that we know of, looked around where they lived and said, "hey we've seen absolutely nothing of the rest of the universe, but so far, this seems like the only place where life exists! Therefore, life must only be able to exist in these conditions!" "Habitable zones" as we define it, don't mean a damned thing, on a universal scale.
Quite apart from that, simple probability dictates that it is for all practical purposes impossible for there to NOT be other sentient life in the galaxy, much less the universe.
I think this goes a little too deep into what your subconcious makes you do.
ReplyI don't find zombies scary because they force me into an uncomfortable philosophical position, I find them scary because they look almost like people, but wrong and malevolent. That's why we find most scary creatures scary. Gollum, for instance. Humanoid, but too think and with an deformed face.
Zombies terrify me...Their brains stop working. Gotta say, one of the biggest turn-off of Christianity is the recognition that Jesus is a zombie, and when he returns and resurects everyone, EVERYONE will be a zombie... >.
I don't know what subconscious reasoning there might be behind it, but I find zombies terrifying just because they spread. The idea that something you hate, fear and look down on can make you identical to it, I spose.
Actually I think the fact that we consider vampires to be sexy heroes and heroines is a sign of a society so far removed, from suffering and superstition, that we are now outgrowing our scapegoats. Because the world isn't too bleak a place to face any more, we are able to confront and abolish the fears that these creatures represent.
ReplyAnd once that's done we are able to make peace with our id's and f**k the goats.
the new monsters are called "terrorists" they are indescribable, but are everywhere... and as the article states, they are the cause of everything bad in the world. sounds like a monster to me.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYeah, we got new ones.
Though I doubt muslims will be the sexy vampires in 200 years
not muslims Steftj. terrorists in general. like the unibomber (who was white and a terrorist) Terrorists have already gone through this process of demonization and glamorization. what do you think the anti-hero in an action movie is? he is the sparkly sexy terroist. and it didn't take 200 years.
@David Wong:
ReplyRegarding the bit on zombies, the "ancient Babylonian epic" you cite is the Epic of Gilgamesh (don't know why you didn't just pop the name in there); however this text wasn't Babylonian, it was Mesopotamian. As can be easily found on Wikipedia, Babylonia, while occupying the same geographical area (that of modern Iraq) and being comprised of a populace of generally the same ethnic peoples as Mesopotamia, came into existence roughly 1300 years AFTER the initial founding of Mesopotamia (which is, archeologically speaking, the first civilization of modern humanity). In short, the Epic of Gilgamesh is OLDER than the culture you ascribe to producing it. FYI.
WITCH!
The first tablets were written in Sumerian; the longest and most complete version of the epic, known as the Standard Version, WAS written in Babylonian, by a Babylonian poet. Some scholars believe this poet may have taken the many stories and legends based on Gilgamesh (a historical king of Sumer who ruled sometime before 2000 BCE) and condensed them into the epic we know today. So technically, the epic is Babylonian, based on older Sumerian short stories. Additionally, Mesopotamia refers to an area where many of the earliest civilizations lived, such as the Sumerians, Babylonians or Assyrians; not a culture. It’s like saying all of South America is one culture. Not accurate.
I am reading Stephen Mitchell’s translation of the epic right now and it is FAN-freakin-TASTIC! Seriously a good read people, check it out! Very spicy and epicy :)
With the zombie thing, people back then saw Zombies as cursed and hexed beings. George Romero saw a voodoo zombie movie and got the idea, "Hey, why not make a zombie movie that is about the dead eating other people. Which in turn, turns that person into another walking corpse. (source; Zombiemania) We the now people don't care much about Voodoo zombies or the Hex/cursed zombies. We all care about that one zombie that wants to eat your flesh and turn you into another zombie like that one zombie game. The idea of the dead coming back, your right on that part. The idea of a virus or something backing the dead come back and eat other people, is now and what matters.
ReplyActually, the reason why people fear the dead didn't come from that "what makes us human" shit. It's the uncanny valley. You see something that looks like a human but clearly isn't. There's something wrong. It's why people avoid the diseased. They instinctively know "sick/dead people = bad".
ReplyThen comes the creepy part: this thing that looks like a human but clearly isn't must be something dead. But now it's movingHOLYSHITRUNFORYOURLIFE! The uncanny valley is that nagging voice in the back of your head RUN FOR GOD SAKES RUN YOU f*****g IDIOT DO YOU WANT TO DIE?! THAT's where zombies come from. THAT's why they're scary. Because they were once human. They were once people. But now they're... different. Pet Sematary touched on it. How when he brought his cat back from the dead he seemed just wrong, even though he couldn't quite put his finger on it, that it was just a cat that LOOKED like his cat but wasn't.
The psychological aspect comes when you realize that zombies were once people. Human beings, with a soul. This was a person. At what point does a body stop being a "loved one" and start being a "corpse"? To put it spiritually, at what point does the soul leave the body? It's like when you see your dead pet. You still hug it, but after awhile you back away because you instinctively know "this is a dead animal". It's not Spot anymore, it's a dead animal. THAT's the psychological part.
By "bring him back" do you mean that they managed to resuscitate him, that they found a cat just like him, or that they managed to clone him? Because the latter two options have a very simple explanations for the man's feelings: it wasn't his cat. Both would be completely different animals.
As for resuscitation, that's because nobody REALLY believes you can come back from death, so if you see something that has you won't quite process it. We're taught all our lives that death is final, so seeing it NOT be final is probably quite a shock.
(I don't know how to reply to a reply, but...)
Zacula, in Pet Sematary, they literally just... bring things back from the dead. I hate to spoil the story, but the whole thing revolves around a burial ground where buried corpses become reanimated. However, once the bodies claw back out of their graves, they're...different. So it was the man's physical cat, but its personality and even the way it moved were altered by its reanimation.
The aliens concept is different. Isn't it a dick move to believe that we are so special out of the entire universe, only Earth managed to evolve?
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesTell that to the Catholic Church.
Or for that matter, the Pentecostals.
It doesn't make sense if you subscribe to the popular erroneous perception that time and space are absolute. Remove that veil, and it makes perfect sense. There are no "aliens". There are inter-dimensional entities however...
He specified that he was referred to grays though, and it's kind of less reasonable to believe that out of the entire universe the other planet evolved creatures that kind of look like us but creepier, and have a passion for abducting humans and making crop circles.
@EdenRocks ....What? I am fully aware that time is not an absolute: It's malleable to a certain degree and is mostly based on perception. Space less so, but still. Either way, it's not erroneous to believe that other parts of the universe contain life or something similar to life. Heck,think about the viruses of Earth. Nobody technically considers them living, but they do reproduce and move independently. They simply need living organisms in order to do so. What's to say that some part of our universe wouldn't ALSO contain something similar to life, though it may not quite meet the Earth definition?
If your life as a human lasts only an instant in comparison to the life after, and all universal laws have zero impact on what is actually the "real reality" of your situation, if you think about that, then what I am saying will make perfect sense to you. What difference do "aliens out there" make whatsoever, if you don't even grasp the slightest nature of your own existence?
I always have a problem reading these articles. I feel like Cracked writers just spout off the easiest anthropological/historical reasons that the History Channel is telling them that day. And, a lot of times they display it as fact even though there are several answers. Or, what the writer is telling you is outdated information.
ReplyYet here you are anyway.
Its a laughs followed by "facts" format, please dont take it too seriously (if you did you should probably re-bury that corpse asap)
Lévi-Strauss has also pointed out that our complex relation to the dead stems from a feeling of guilt. We feel guilty of having inherited the world, which actually belonged to the people who are now dead. Children don't feel guilty yet, in part because they are themselves the very symbol of the dead (the dead leave, children arrive). For Lévi-Strauss, Santa Claus is a tool grown-ups use to placate children/the dead in order to assuage our guilt (I'm not kidding).
Replyi, personally, do believe in aliens.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesi just don't believe our sleeping anuses are interesting enough for anyone to develop faster than light travel for.
seriously. if life existed in a star system 40 light years away.... even if they could travel at 10 times the speed of light it would be an eight year round trip just to ass-rape a hillbillie late one night.
then again, they could be extraordinarily long lived and just have NOTHING to do closer to home. what do i know?
Ah but by the same principle, If you were a lone alien and had been traveling for 8 years for an unrelated reason you would be damn horny by the time you finally got off your at your destination. sort of like how you dont take a 12 hour fight to masturbate in your destinations airport toilet, but when you arrive it may be at the top of your priorities list...
I agree. I believe aliens exist simply because it's almost statistically impossible for them NOT to exist. But I don't have any beliefs either way as to whether any have ever visited Earth. And unless they've been here for an incredibly long time, I doubt that they rape people, or if they do, it's not intentionally. Their biology and psychology is probably so different from ours that they wouldn't even have a concept of what rape is or perhaps even of what sex is. If you saw an alien that looked absolutely nothing like any organism on the face of the Earth, would you know how their bodies work or what part does what? If you were feeling quite bold, you might touch the alien out of curiosity, or try to talk to it, and for all you know your slightest touch could cause them traumatizing injury, or maybe they can feel your voice and it's so different from what they're used to that it causes sensory overload and is really painful. So, on the flip side, perhaps the anal rape is just aliens trying to communicate with us or figure out how we work. Maybe their species communicates by inserting some kind of organ into another's orifice and exchanging electrical signals or some weird s**t like that. Of course that's just one ad hoc explanation, and that's assuming that aliens have ever even graced our galaxy, let alone our solar system, let alone walked the Earth, let alone raped anyone (intentionally or not).
I love that your sensible, thought-provoking comment boiled down to "maybe aliens ass-rape each other to say hello"
I didn't see this posted so here goes! Humans didn't live with dinosaus, Cracked, why you no post accurate info. =P
ReplyThey were making fun of the Flintstones the whole time, hence the dinosaurs.
Just wanted to point out about the out of body thing: THere have been experimetns done where doctors placed random objects in operationg room on top of high shelves to high for a person to see from bellow. Then after a surgery if the person says they had an out of body experience they would ask the person if they saw something on top of the shelf and the person would describe it in perfect detail.
Replythat's a bit bizarre. Could you perchance link one of those experiments?
I remember seeing that in psychology, wish I could remember what the programme was called. The fact that I saw it as part of the A level psych syllabus means it must have seemed somewhat credible, at least at the time. I'll come back if I find or remember the programme title or the study.
popular, right. nevermind, haha
Replywhat about the shadow people? they're even in super mario galaxy 1 or 2(covered in an earlier article dont remember which one)
Reply