5 Myths That People Don't Realize Are Admitted Hoaxes
It's no surprise that the world gets taken in by hoaxers and con men. They're really good at what they do and most of us are bored enough to believe anything as long as it takes our mind off the cubicle for a while.
And even when the hoaxers get accused of fakery, we may still take their side. After all, those negative doubting types try to shoot down everything! Who cares what they say! What is harder to explain, though, is the times when the perpetrators of a hoax come out themselves and confess to the fakery... and people still go right on believing.

This famous picture, which shows what looks like the head of a prehistoric creature emerging from the waves of Scotland's Loch Ness, was allegedly snapped by gynecologist Robert Wilson in 1934. It soon became known as the "surgeon's photograph," because searching for "gynecologist's photograph" on Google Images will absolutely not result in finding this picture.
Before Dr. Vagina's famous photo, the Loch Ness Monster had been limited to a few legends and scattered local sightings, which presumably accompanied spottings of highland prostitutes and grain alcohol. After the surgeon's photo, however, the creature gained worldwide attention, despite the fact that Wilson himself denied the Loch Ness Monster even existed and insisted he had just taken a picture of some animal he didn't recognize.

"Ooh, an animal I don't recognize! Good thing I don't believe in monsters or I would be shitting all over myself right now."
Monster sightings and photographs continued unabated in the area for the next 60 years until 1994, when a man named Christian Spurling finally confessed to the hoax. Spurling explained that his father-in-law Marmaduke Wetherall had staged the picture using a fake monster head attached to an 18-inch long toy submarine.
The whole ridiculous plan was an attempt to get back at his employer, a newspaper called the Daily Mail that had ridiculed him in a recent issue. Wetherall had Dr. Wilson submit the picture to give it more "respectability."

The original uncropped image, which is clearly a prehistoric beast and not a duck or a bathtub toy.
And Yet...
So that's the end of the Loch Ness Monster, right?
Not even close. Die-hard cryptozoologists immediately dismissed Spurling's hoax confession, insisting the resources that he described being used to make the fake monster didn't exist in 1934 (fake monster heads would apparently not be invented until much later).
To this day, the Loch Ness Monster industry is thriving, and every few years there's a new, expensive expedition setting out to find it. There was a 2003 BBC special that employed satellites and 600 separate sonar beams to try to track down the beast once and for all.
So Why Do They Still Believe?
The fact that there are "cryptozoologists" in the world (that is, people who specialize in tracking legendary creatures to prove they're real) should tell you. There are people who have staked their reputations on the creature being real and depend on the income from books asserting such. It's not so easy for somebody in that position to give in to the "wooden head glued to a toy submarine" theory.

Latest photograph of the monster.
If there were only some way to walk away from the theory and save face at the same time... oh, wait. Some Loch Ness Monster experts say the creature has probably now died. Due to global warming.
We should also point out that Loch Ness is located in an area where the other main attractions involve grim industrial sprawl and a dish made of ground sheep's heart, so they're going to promote the hell out of any mythical creature they can get their hands on. Scotland would probably be claiming Highlander as a true story if they thought they could get away with it.

In 1922, Howard Carter and his friends opened the tomb of the Pharaoh Tutankhamen in Egypt, unearthing rooms filled with magnificent treasures and igniting a surge of interest in Egyptology. Unfortunately, they also ignited a series of terrifying events that was almost immediately attributed to the "Pharaoh's Curse."
Reports said there was an inscription on the wall of the gravesite that read "They who enter this sacred tomb shall swift be visited by wings of death." Sure enough, Lord Carnarvon, a member of the party who was originally sent to Egypt's warm climate by his doctor because of his poor health, dropped dead days afterward from an infected mosquito bite.

"Ha ha, I'm a mosquito, and... fuck you.
That unfortunate incident likely cast a dubious shadow over any advice Lord Carnarvon's doctor would offer anyone in the future because what fucking doctor tells you to go to Egypt if you're under the weather.
At the moment of Carnarvon's death, a blackout reportedly swept through Cairo, solidifying the notion of an ancient curse that newspapers around the world quickly picked up on.

Only one problem: the "curse" allegedly inscribed on the wall, never existed. It was apparently invented by one of the newspapers that covered the find. Records of curses have been found in other tombs, but evidently King Tut figured being buried in the sands of Egypt inside a giant stone crypt was enough to deter most people from fucking with his dead body.
So, combined with the fact that the curse physically is not there, and that most of Carter's remaining party lived to a ripe old age, you'd suspect this one wouldn't get much traction.
And Yet...
When artifacts from the tomb were on tour in the U.S. and one of the guards suffered a stroke, you guessed it: they blamed it on the curse. This was in the 1970s, 50 freaking years later.
The idea became so utterly entrenched that the concept of cursed Egyptian tombs and mummies is almost as much a cultural icon as the haunted house (count how many mummies you see among the Halloween decorations this year).
The curse has also inspired dozens of movies over the decades and countless dumbass Brendan Fraser one-liners.

Clearly, evil is at work here.
So Why Do They Still Believe?
Let's face it, mummies are awesome. They are corpses left over from a culture that worshiped death and their internal organs are kept in jars carved with the heads of animals. That is metal as fuck, so it's fun to believe they had all sorts of connections to the occult that we can only dream about.
Combine that with the whole "the ancient Mayans predicted the end of the world" theory and you realize that there's something attractive about the idea that people way back when knew things we didn't. Maybe it's because we look around at a world full of inane Twitterings and TV shows about dating Flavor Flav, and find comfort in the idea that once up on a time, not only was the world less retarded, but they possessed wisdom so deep they could bend the rules of time and space.
Sure, it seems a little odd that mankind somehow forgot all this supernatural knowledge when it offers such a gigantic advantage to whoever has it. But that's probably just because we aren't believing hard enough.

The Priory of Sion, a secret society founded by crusaders at Jerusalem's Mt. Zion, was pretty damn cool. Existing since the 11th century, it boasted members such as Leonardo da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Victor Hugo and Master Splinter. The organization's goals were to restore the ancient Merovingian dynasty to the throne in France, and also to be hardcore secretive and have members that were so famous people would still recognize them 900 years later.
Really, the only uncool thing about the Priory of Sion was that it didn't exist.
In court in 1993, Pierre Plantard, a convicted con artist and Frenchman, confessed that he had created the organization in 1965 and named it after Mt. Sion near Annemasse, France, presumably as part of a pitch to ABC for a new prime time action series.
He went to extreme lengths to perpetuate his lie, hiring people to create medieval-looking documents and plant them in France's national library. Why? Well, there was no Society of Creative Anachronism back then and Star Trek didn't go on the air until 1966, so people had to make their own fun.

And Yet...
Nobody paid attention to Plantard's confession. The forgeries had, by this time, been picked up and repeated in a 1982 book called The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, whose authors were fooled by the fake documents planted in the French library.
They insisted that the Merovingians were related to Jesus himself, an idea in turn picked up by Dan Brown for his novel The Da Vinci Code. One inexplicable Tom Hanks haircut later and there was no turning back.

So Why Do They Still Believe?
This sort of thing has the same attraction as any good conspiracy theory: the "I am special because I have secret knowledge the common sheeple never will!" principle.
How better to impress your dull traditional friends than revealing to them the suppressed truth that will totally blow their closed suburban minds? And you only had to spend six bucks in an airport bookstore to get it!
And, like any conspiracy theory, it's difficult or impossible to disprove. After all, if you were a secret organization of the Priory's caliber, couldn't you just fake the fact that the documents were faked?









:( disappointed in cracked for crop circles as #1. When I was a kid I checked out books from the library with pictures of crop circles that had appeared simultaneously many miles apart with crazy patterns and electromagnetic disturbances and interviews with farmers etc etc. Having had a passing interest in the phenomenon, I laughed when I heard that two guys "confessed," just like everyone else who's ever had a passing interest in crop circles. Is it aliens? Ask them the next time you catch them making crop circles. Maybe it's from their spaceships, something akin to the brown stain car exhaust leaves on snow. Maybe gremlins are doing it when we're asleep just to confuse us. One thing's for certain, it wasn't two effing guys making thousands of crop circles in physically impossible ways this entire time.
ReplySo those aliens are going to shove a probe up Mel Gibson´s ass. And we know how *that* ends.
ReplyIn #5 the thing they say is the "uncropped Surgeon's Photo" is partially correct...in that it is another photo by the Surgeon. It is the second of the three photos he took, however it is cropped just as the first one is. The uncropped versions both show the distant far shore allowing for the comparison
Replyof the creature in the photo to the trees and other landmarks there. Comparing the measurements and examining the uncropped photo led to the size of what is sticking out of the water to be just over 7 feet tall. Sizes it's hard to produce with a duck or toy, and the three stages of it's arrangment in the photos makes accusations of it being a simple toy or stick (things put forth by skeptics, including the man that just before the "reveal" on the part of a supposed co-conspirator to the hoax paid off all the "co-conspirator's" debts,) ridiculous.
You forgot The Evolution Theory.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesPeople still believe that fish turned to monkeys, that dinosssaurs turned to chickens and some terrestrial mammal wanted to take a swim and turned to whales, because nature wanted to be like that, ramdomly and because miiiiillions of years are the solution for everything, all of this without one solid proof (yeah, I'm know you will say that are hundreds of proof). No, I'm not a creationist neihter religious etc, I'm just a skeptical, but Evolution is good hoax that people began to believe like a religion to try to combat religion and combat the church that liked to poke the nose in everything.
Even Darwin knew many the failures of the theory and some notorius Evolucionists admited the status of "substituting religion" that Evolution conquered, like Michael Ruse said:
"Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion -- a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaint -- and Mr. Gish [Duane T. Gish the Creation Scientist] is but one of many to make it -- the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today."
And as Karl Popper as said:
"Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research program."
Oh well. I know people gets angry when someone talks something bad about their religion, but ok, I understand you all. People need to believe in something after all, and this is an article made by neo-atheists for neo-atheists (also know as pseudo-skeptcs).
Hugs from a real skeptcal.
tl;dr
Ah shaddup.
Right because it makes perfect logical sense that a giant bearded man in the sky made the earth in 7 days and created this first man out of earth. Also it makes pleanty of sense that YOU of all people would know the divine mechanisms used to create the world by such an omnipresent being. That about soothe your ego fucko
As I point out to all lunatics that discount evolution, there is a perfect example in modern times that is perfectly traceable of the fact that evolution can create very wildly differing forms: DOGS!!!! All the various wildly different breeds of dog in the WORLD are descendants of a bloodline traceable to a handful of wolves.
There's a difference between being a skeptic and just being contrary.
Yeah just gonna have to put my two cents in on this...learn microbiology, biostatistics, neurobiology, geneology, genetic algorithms, neural networks, how DNA and RNA work, study plant generations among different species, and any other branch of science that has anything to do with life on a chronic scale, and then study statistics and figure out that the reason "non-evolutionists" get to say that evolution isn't "proven" is because scientists don't "prove" things, they determine percentages of likelihood based on existing data and empirical evidence. By the layman's use of the word "proof," evolution has been proven as well as the technology that runs the internet and lands rockets.
Many years ago I saw a TV show where these guys (maybe the ones mentioned) not only claimed to have made crop circles, but actually went out and did one. After they were done the "crop circle experts" were called in to evaluate and claimed that the crop circle in question was genuine and couldn't possible have been created by humans. After reading the comments here, I now know the answer to the question of why people still believe in them. It's because people are REALLY STUPID!
ReplyThe Elaborate ones are the obvious Hoaxes.
When has their ever been any evidence of crop circle's emerging in a matter of minutes? I remember spotting about one single video back in the day but that doesn't seem to have ever been looked at by anybody out side of the crop circle community. The idea that complex fractal patterns were beyond Doug and Dave is fair enough but to assume no human being could ever create something so complex is an insult to human ingenuity. None of the patterns are that complex.
ReplyThe 1700 century "crop circle" stems from a wood cutting of the devil cutting down crops (not in a circle) that was drawn after a farmer complained about how much the guy that was supposed to be cutting his crops down wanted for the job, so no evidence of them prior to Doug and Dave. Nothing within crop circle "phenomena" would imply that some alien force or other-worldy intelligence got up one morning and decided the best way to communicate with us or each other was bending a whole bunch of plants into fractal patterns. They'd find better ways to communicate with us (by contacting world leaders or scientists for instance, rather than putting patterns in fields that only people that are already convinced they exist pay attention to). As to the idea that the patterns are used to communicate with each other, I really, really, really, really doubt any aliens capable of travelling millions of light years through space would have forgotten to bring a radio.
Ummm...Doug and Dave were never able to reproduce the intricacies of the circles, like the fractal kind that emerge in a matter of minutes. They yet to have been sufficiently explained. The stalks bending without breaking, the strange weaving they do, the enlarged nodes.... Dave and Doug undoubtedly made crop circles, but could not, among many inconsistencies in their stories, explain multiple circles appearing at the same over many square miles. Personally I don't know what causes the more larger and detailed circles, but it's concluded that Dave and Doug were their own hoax.
ReplyI love the logic behind debunking crop circles - two guys in England made a couple so they are all human made hoaxes. Brilliant. I don't know what or who makes all the crop circles, but if they are all anonymous hoaxes, bravo for all that effort for nothing.
I've thought about this and I think if they are human hoaxes, it's probably men. As a guy I can't see teams of women wasting their time on this. I've also narrowed guy's motivations to four, sometimes overlapping, motives - sex, money, fame, power over others. None of these explain crop circles as hoaxes. If you can get laid by creating a crop circle we're doomed to world wide famine - there won't be a crop standing. I'd be out there right now. Money - who's paying for the crop circles? Fame - they're anonymous. Power over others? Sure people talk about them. Them, not you. Aliens? Vortexes? Frat boys? Damned if I know.
I still like the arguments against hoaxes. They're created in the dark of night, no mistakes, no witnesses, no half done jobs. Can I prove how they come to be? No. Can the debunkers? Not yet.
Given that the first crop circle was recorded in the late seventeenth century, I think we can safely say they're not a hoax.
You mean the events in Highlander were real? I'm sold!
ReplyWhat's incredibly infuriating is that people believe in the supernatural even when people start out by saying they don't have magical powers. Derren Brown does mind tricks but says over and over he doesn't have magical powers because they don't exist. He even has written books explaining how to do it (some of the basic stuff). Yet people still say; "I think derren is psychic". ARRRGH!
ReplyOf course, any psychic wouldn't want to draw attention to his powers.
As everybody knows, all psychics get their powers from a Faustian contract which prevents them from revealing where they actually get their powers.
Duh.
Haha if this earth ever had aliens advanced enough to come visit us. Not only would they not be afraid of us, but they'd be "intelligent" enough (judging by the ability to travel as far as they have) to extinct our entire race before any of us could say "Sam's my Uncle" if they had reason to! Assuming that they're as menacing and greedy as humans can be that is.
ReplyExterminate is the word you're looking for, not 'extinct' extinct is not a verb.
ummm...every documentary about the Loch Ness monster that I've ever seen for as long as I can remember has made a special point of saying that the surgeon's photo was a fake, you'd have to have made a deliberate point of not learning anything about the Loch Ness monster to think that that photo was still commonly regarded as genuine proof among those who study it.
ReplyAs for the whole crop circles thing, it is true that those men only confessed to creating the crop circles in a specific area (I don't know why people always ignore that fact) and some crop circles are far too complex to have been made without an aerial view of the field. Also tiny particles or certain metals have been found in some crop circles.
No.
Durr, of course there's particles of metal, what do you think the bloody equipment is made of?
Why would Americans assume Nazis were invading in 1938? Correct me if I'm wrong, but at that point the Nazis hadn't invaded anyone. Their first invasion wasn't until September 1, 1939 when they rolled into Poland. Prior to that they were all talk.
ReplyBecause they marched into the rhineland unapposed and then re-took the saar in czeslovakia before taking the whole country in early 1939. They also merged with Austria in the Anshluss. So their claim of "one more country and then we're done" was looking a wee bit suspicious. Not that the US, UK or France cared because they were more frightened of Russia and didn't give a f**k about the groups the nazis were oppressing
Just a small correction to this post, it states that "including Mary Todd Lincoln who held seances in the White House in an effort to communicate with her three dead sons." In reality only two of her sons had died before or during the Lincoln's time at the white house. There son Eddie died in 1850 and Willie died in 1862.
Replythe two old fools who claimed to fake crop circles were liars. they could never show how they did it. they refused, and even groups of professional circlemakers have many flaws in the mathematics of the way they do it. you can tell the real thing from the manmade. not to mention, the phenomena started IN THE 1600'S when it was known as the mowing devil. so im guessing those 2 old guys have been doin it for the past couple hundred years? yeah. right. and on all different continents too. also, how do you explain sand circles, and snow/ice circles, YES, THEYRE REAL too!
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesThe two guys said they were inspired to do it, meaning they were not the first. Plus it has been done. I've seen videos on youtube of people doing it with boards.
There are two different types of crops circles. The ones that are shown as being man-made have been damaged at the bending site. The other type has no damage at the bending site and (supposedly) cannot be explained. I had a professor who studied this crap in college (Steven Spignesi).
And the 600 year old woodcut showing one.
I was kind of expecting to see "Paul is dead" on here
ReplyFWIW, I had a girlfriend that did a huge college project on Paul, and got like every scholarly book about it from the library (UO in Eugene), and I read them all when I was bored and helped her with the project, and to our surprise (like a lot of conspiracy theories...coincidentally!) it's really likely that Paul is dead. He was in a serious car crash followed immediately by a lookalike contest. Seriously.
But even Doug and Dave admitted that they were inspired to make crop circles because they had heard stories about them. They weren't the original crop circlers.
ReplyBut they were the first to make complicated circles that could not be attributed to weather and other common effects. Its not real, we are not special.
"Dude, we have got to get in on this."
ReplyI lawled.
I feell a pressing need to start me some large-scale unregistered hootenannies.
ReplyNot on the same night as my ho-down, you better not!
Is this going to interrupt my shenanigans?
Jaws is so real, they made 4 movies about him and his mother.
ReplyAlso I'm drunk. I am aware this doesn't help dispel any stereotypes that people may have for the Scots, but you know what? F U C K Y O U
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesThat was actually 3 words but oddly you got cryptozoological right. I have to say you are a rather high functioning drunk and I find myself attracted to that.
DontHurlEmoGurlX I'm fairly sure this magestic scot here meant the 'New Jersey and Bigfoot' as it.
not the 'you yankee fuck'
Or, also, the 'and' counts as a word.
But I must agree. The added scottishness makes it even better.
I'm from Belfast- We also hate the english.. well half of us.
@RedAnarchySally
The other half just hate everyone. Amirite?
Cut and paste is seen as both high functioning AND a turn on?
stereotypes my arse. Im hammered myself, although it is Friday so i suppose its to be expected. also im from Aberdeen. and used to work in a bar so im allowed to say most Scots are alcoholic racists
i take that back. sincerely its actually Saturday, just.
Slaine mhor, ye mad bamstick!