The 15 Most Shameless Fake Photos Ever Passed Off as Real
For as long as there have been photos, there have been clumsy and blatant attempts to manipulate them. In an age when you can't believe what you see, ever, under any circumstances, we offer up 15 of the most poorly manipulated photos, broken down into a handy guide to the warning signs that the picture you're looking at might not be what it appears...

Scientists have proven that politicians are magnetically attracted to bullshit. If you ever find yourself looking at a photo of a politician, keep in mind that the subject in the photograph is probably looking for the best way to trick you out of your vote/civil rights/a million dollars.
15. Republicans Suck at Internet Research, Quite Good at Photoshop Though

Do a Google Image Search for Al Franken, with safe search off. The above pic of Al in a diaper with a stuffed bear is, as of the time of this writing, the #2 result. Wow, amazing that he ever won an election with a photo like that out there!

Wow, what an oddly similar facial expression.
Well, the fact that it's Photoshop helps. When it seemed Al Franken was serious about this whole "getting involved in politics" thing in 2006, the Ohio Republican party set out to show people what a crazy, wacky nutjob he was. Republican strategists tried to find an embarrassing photo of Franken and failed, presumably because Ohio doesn't have the Internet and had never seen a late night cut of Stuart Saves His Family on Comedy Central.

This picture already exists.
The party did have a copy of Photoshop though, so they took a photo of a man dressed as a baby and stuck Franken's head on it. The photo was soon exposed as a fake and the Republicans quickly fired their public relations team, evidently because people felt that raping the Snuggles bear was crossing the line. What we can't figure out is why they stopped there. If you're Photoshopping anyway, why not make it a dirty diaper?
14. Mickey Mouse Mayor

OK, so what can possibly be wrong with this picture? It's a lady running for Mayor of New Orleans, with a standard picture of her standing in the French Quarter. Even if it's Photoshopped, so what? Surely she's been there before.
Ask yourself what's the saddest possible way this could go wrong. Well, it's sadder than that. See, in Disneyland they have a little area they've set up to look like the French Quarter (New Orleans Square). When her staff went looking for some generic shot to use as their background, guess what they found?
Yes, not only was it Photoshop, but they accidentally Photoshopped her in front of a Disneyland mockup of the city she was running for Mayor of.
13. Republicans Suck at Internet Research, Quite Good at Photoshop Though (Part 2)

During the 2004 election, Republicans needed to smear John Kerry as a radical, war-protesting Hippy. They decided the most damning piece of evidence would be a picture of him sitting right next to the queen of radical war-protesting hippies, Jane Fonda.
They grabbed the two photos above, one of Jane Fonda at a political rally and one of John Kerry at an anti-war rally, and prayed nobody would notice. People did, of course. But saddest of all? There is an actual real image of Jane Fonda sitting next to John Kerry at a Vietnam protest that was freely available.
What was the point? Hell, since they took the trouble, might as well have stuck a diaper on him.
12. Baby Hitler Made to Look Like Evil Baby

On one hand, this is probably the lowest political Photoshop trick possible. On the other hand, the victim was Hitler. The photo on the far left was printed in newspapers around the world in the 1930s as an image of Hitler as a baby. Look at that scowling asshole! Fuck him!
The photo was actually a retouched image of an American child (middle), because we are way more fat and evil looking than anyone in Europe. The real Hitler, above right, looked like any other (sissy) baby, full of innocence and mild confusion.
Yeah, yeah, it's Hitler, so anything goes. But doesn't it promote the idea that people are born good or evil? Sort of playing into the whole Master Race thing, isn't it?
Speaking of Hitler, another sign that a photo is a bad fake...

Mass murdering dictators are, in many respects, exactly like everyone else. For instance, they hate getting their photo taken, especially if that photograph embarrasses them in some way, or if they had everyone else in the photo was killed the next day.
It should come as no surprise then that they often touch up those photographs to remove any embarrassing spots, blemishes, stress marks and victims of political assassinations.
11. In Soviet Union, Stalin Kills You, and Everyone Else in the Photo

No one was better at this than Stalin. When he had a dude killed, he reached back and erased him from history. The above collection of four photos (from Wikipedia) is actually the same photo, as it evolved through the years and retouching. The four colleagues became three, then two, then just Stalin, as each of the other three did something to piss him off and were sent to the great Politburo in the sky.
This is probably just an optical illusion, but we swear the expression on Stalin's face gets a little lonelier each time. Good thing those kind of shenanigans are in Russia's distant past, right?
10. Vladamir Putin Will Make You Disappear from Television
And by distant past, we mean 2007. That's when Mikhail Delyagin appeared on the Russian chat show The People Want to Know... or maybe he didn't. Delyagin had made comments critical of Vladimir Putin, the Russian Prime Minister who decided that the people did not, in fact, want to know anything Delaygin had to say.


"Comrades, the truth is the set was merely haunted by the ghost of Vladmir Notorso."

We've all figured out by this point that we view celebrities purely through a lens of cellulite-removal photo retouching. We can hardly blame them. We don't want to see all the nasty warts that (in reality) cover half of Rihanna's face.
But sometimes prettying things up just isn't enough, and that's when things start to get weird. And sleazy.
9. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie too far apart for Star Magazine

Brad and Angelina caught together! And he's totally married to somebody else at the time! They've even got the photo to prove it!
Of course, the magazine is stretching the definition of "together" a little, since Angelina is in Virginia and Brad is in the Caribbean. Still, they're on the same planet, so you know they were totally up to something. The magazine included a disclaimer on page 8 saying the cover was a "composite of two different photographs," proving once and for all that it's OK to lie to sell your magazine as long as you tell everyone the truth in tiny print beneath an unrelated article about Jerry O'Connell's beach house.
Again, we bring up the "if you're going to be Photoshopping anyway... " issue from earlier: Why not have them fucking? Tell us that wouldn't sell some magazines right there.
8. 15-Year-Old Character Too Small-Breasted for Hollywood

Warner Bros. knew that people go see Harry Potter movies for one reason: big ol' titties.
Their problem of course was that the leading lady was the 17-year-old Emma Watson, playing a 15-year-old Hermione Granger. Wait, did we say "problem"? Nothing is a problem when you have Photoshop!
A digital boob job and tummy tuck later, and you've got a busty girl wizard who'll put asses in the seats, dammit! Somebody probably got a raise over that shit.
7. Andy Roddick Too Skinny for Men's Fitness

Hey, the ladies aren't the only ones getting Photoshop boob jobs these days! Look at the pecs on that guy!
In 2007, Men's Fitness ran a feature on how to build big arms. To show off how to build a massive, Arnold Schwarzenegger-esque upper body they used... tennis star Andy Roddick?
Look, Cracked.com doesn't have a corporate tennis team for one reason only: massive, pumped up guns aren't ideal for swinging a racket. That's why Mr. Roddick (real body shown on the right) wasn't ideal for this particular cover. No problem! Crop that head and stick it on the body of some dude with the chest and biceps of the Incredible fucking Hulk!








I don't see too big a deal with the Beyonce picture. I really like the woman and I barely recognized the darker image. She has indeed dyed her hair blonde by now, they didn't do that, and many images and videos of her in bright lighting make her appear fairly fair-skinned. If you see her in-shadow, she's a littler darker. It's a concept that rose in the 1800's, light DOES manipulate the shades of color. I've no doubt they smoothed the skin and all that, but I highly doubt they tried to make her white. :P
Replythey photoshopped kiera knightleys chest on the cover of king arthur.
ReplyThat was the best ending line in an article ever...
Replyi would just like to say that in britain, finding a 17-year-old sexually attractive is not a problem since the age of consent is 16.
ReplySo? In Colombia es 14.
it is somewhat weird if you're over 40.
like the former Italian prime minister and his 16 year older hookers.
Holy shit. Hitler was adorable.
Reply"Cody remains missing in action, despite the joint efforts of GI Joe, the Thundercats and the Millennium Falcon." LOL that was funny!
ReplyMan...the quality really varies greatly from one contributor to another on here doesn't it. Showing your blatant lib-tardness just makes you less funny (if that's at all possible), just how bad do you need approval from others? Sad.
Reply Hide All See All 6 Replies"Waah! I'm a conservative! Just thought you would like to know! Waaah!"
The most predictable thing, and yet they still do it at the drop of a hat.
Both of you really piss me off.
JEFFX13...just how bad do you need approval? How sad.
You're aware this is a comedy site yes? go scream about each others political views on the Fox News forums or something.
you americans and your politics...
Fox News has forums? Wow, that must be the greatest repository of wisdom since the Library of Alexandria burned down.
My favorite thing about the Hermione digital boob-job is the "SEE IT IN IMAX 3-D" in the retouched one. Wow, IMAX 3-D really does make things spring right out at you!
ReplyI think I woke my neighbors up laughing when I got to "Warner Bros. knew that people go see Harry Potter movies for one reason: big ol' titties."
ReplyBeyonce is just as attractive white as she is black. Daaaaamn
ReplyNumber 8 was crazy. How ridiculous! I am an 18 year old (horny) male and I hardly saw the difference. What an insult to Emma Watson! Frickin' fags.
ReplyI wonder how the magazine issue would look like if OJ was white...(non-racist)(Just Curious)
ReplyThey would have put out a photo of Ron Goldman in a light that made him look black, and marketed it as a hate crime. People killing people without racial tension doesn't sell magazines.
4, 5, and 6. Ah yes, wonderful examples of American racism. Only surpassed by Chinese racism.
ReplyIn Memorium: Cody...
ReplyThe last sentence on #1 was made of pure epic win. : D
ReplyI think the one about Emma Watson is wrong. If you look at the photos, the so called 'unaltered' one looks heaps better then the supposed 'altered'one. Her hair is fuller, the contrast is much nicer and the make up is far more flawless. Also she is a very nicely curved girl in real life and considering she was a 17 year old trying to play a 15 year old I would think it would make more sense to downsize the breasts and take out the waist, so that she'd appear younger.
ReplyWe demand BOOBIES!!!
#7 is some of the worst photoshopping I've seen. I'm not suprised they didn't get away with it.
ReplySo the author does the republican ones but nothing with the Palin bikini + gun?
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesGuess I know how they vote.
Hey shut-up! You're confusing the liberals.
I believe that was done as a joke and I am not aware of anyone using said photo as anything other than a joke. The ones that were mentioned in this article were made and used as political tools. Also, her in a bikini with a gun is not harmful to her, she is pro-gun and a former beauty contestant, so I see neither as negative to her. Lastly in order for Democrats to create a conspiracy to make false images or anything, they would first have to agree on something and get something done. They can do neither. Republicans are all on the same page, the problem is it is a page from Satan's handbook. Democrats are each on a different page from different books, most of which are nonsense childrens' stories. We the people are screwed either way.
psykotik is my new best friend :3
psykotik - I'm with you mostly, but there was some instances of that photo being used in online Dem PAC's (for some reason, I vaguely recall her also holding a beer). It was ran under something about the people at the party in danger by drunk Palin or something to that effect. I think a Dem intern at one of the PAC's actually DID do it as a joke, but when passing it along to his friends, based on his "job" - they took it as real and the rest is history.
That's of course the "fun" version. There's extremists on both sides, even blaming each other (Repubs purposefully leaked it so that Palin would look great in a bikini and then people would side with her sexuality), blaming themselves and what not.
Actually, the whole story behind the toppled statue was the citizens where defacing it so a US vehicles pulled it down. They made no effort to fool anyone about who did what. You make it sound like they rounded up a bunch of unwilling Iraqi civilians at gunpoint to stand around a statue for a photo shoot. If that had happened we would STILL be hearing about it.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesUm, that's exactly what the Army did. Exactly what they did. Where the f**k have you been these last ten years?
evilcor i hope ur joking nobody would have held them at gunpoint
Evilcor: "Um, that's exactly what the Army did. Exactly what they did."
No. It isn't.
Nobody has ever pretended that it was anyone other than a tank recovery vehicle from 3rd Battalion, 9th Marines.
"Where the f**k have you been these last ten years?"
Listening to liberals tell the same damn lie over and over again.
Everybody putting politics in every goddamned article needs to be hanged, drawn, and quartered.
Seriously.
On #2, I'm not sure they ever tried to fool anybody. The footage of the soldiers pulling down the statue was shown live on every major network. And before the soldiers arrived, a crowd of Iraqis was trying to take it down with ropes and a sledge hammer. On a related note, how come none of the photoshopped pictures of Sarah Palin made it on the list? The one with her face on a shotgun toting bikini model was as fake/hilarious as hell.
ReplyThe difference is that everyone new the Sarah Palin one was fake and never tried to pass it off as real to hurt her.
*knew