The 15 Most Shameless Fake Photos Ever Passed Off as Real
For as long as there have been photos, there have been clumsy and blatant attempts to manipulate them. In an age when you can't believe what you see, ever, under any circumstances, we offer up 15 of the most poorly manipulated photos, broken down into a handy guide to the warning signs that the picture you're looking at might not be what it appears...

Scientists have proven that politicians are magnetically attracted to bullshit. If you ever find yourself looking at a photo of a politician, keep in mind that the subject in the photograph is probably looking for the best way to trick you out of your vote/civil rights/a million dollars.
15. Republicans Suck at Internet Research, Quite Good at Photoshop Though

Do a Google Image Search for Al Franken, with safe search off. The above pic of Al in a diaper with a stuffed bear is, as of the time of this writing, the #2 result. Wow, amazing that he ever won an election with a photo like that out there!

Wow, what an oddly similar facial expression.
Well, the fact that it's Photoshop helps. When it seemed Al Franken was serious about this whole "getting involved in politics" thing in 2006, the Ohio Republican party set out to show people what a crazy, wacky nutjob he was. Republican strategists tried to find an embarrassing photo of Franken and failed, presumably because Ohio doesn't have the Internet and had never seen a late night cut of Stuart Saves His Family on Comedy Central.

This picture already exists.
The party did have a copy of Photoshop though, so they took a photo of a man dressed as a baby and stuck Franken's head on it. The photo was soon exposed as a fake and the Republicans quickly fired their public relations team, evidently because people felt that raping the Snuggles bear was crossing the line. What we can't figure out is why they stopped there. If you're Photoshopping anyway, why not make it a dirty diaper?
14. Mickey Mouse Mayor

OK, so what can possibly be wrong with this picture? It's a lady running for Mayor of New Orleans, with a standard picture of her standing in the French Quarter. Even if it's Photoshopped, so what? Surely she's been there before.
Ask yourself what's the saddest possible way this could go wrong. Well, it's sadder than that. See, in Disneyland they have a little area they've set up to look like the French Quarter (New Orleans Square). When her staff went looking for some generic shot to use as their background, guess what they found?
Yes, not only was it Photoshop, but they accidentally Photoshopped her in front of a Disneyland mockup of the city she was running for Mayor of.
13. Republicans Suck at Internet Research, Quite Good at Photoshop Though (Part 2)

During the 2004 election, Republicans needed to smear John Kerry as a radical, war-protesting Hippy. They decided the most damning piece of evidence would be a picture of him sitting right next to the queen of radical war-protesting hippies, Jane Fonda.
They grabbed the two photos above, one of Jane Fonda at a political rally and one of John Kerry at an anti-war rally, and prayed nobody would notice. People did, of course. But saddest of all? There is an actual real image of Jane Fonda sitting next to John Kerry at a Vietnam protest that was freely available.
What was the point? Hell, since they took the trouble, might as well have stuck a diaper on him.
12. Baby Hitler Made to Look Like Evil Baby

On one hand, this is probably the lowest political Photoshop trick possible. On the other hand, the victim was Hitler. The photo on the far left was printed in newspapers around the world in the 1930s as an image of Hitler as a baby. Look at that scowling asshole! Fuck him!
The photo was actually a retouched image of an American child (middle), because we are way more fat and evil looking than anyone in Europe. The real Hitler, above right, looked like any other (sissy) baby, full of innocence and mild confusion.
Yeah, yeah, it's Hitler, so anything goes. But doesn't it promote the idea that people are born good or evil? Sort of playing into the whole Master Race thing, isn't it?
Speaking of Hitler, another sign that a photo is a bad fake...

Mass murdering dictators are, in many respects, exactly like everyone else. For instance, they hate getting their photo taken, especially if that photograph embarrasses them in some way, or if they had everyone else in the photo was killed the next day.
It should come as no surprise then that they often touch up those photographs to remove any embarrassing spots, blemishes, stress marks and victims of political assassinations.
11. In Soviet Union, Stalin Kills You, and Everyone Else in the Photo

No one was better at this than Stalin. When he had a dude killed, he reached back and erased him from history. The above collection of four photos (from Wikipedia) is actually the same photo, as it evolved through the years and retouching. The four colleagues became three, then two, then just Stalin, as each of the other three did something to piss him off and were sent to the great Politburo in the sky.
This is probably just an optical illusion, but we swear the expression on Stalin's face gets a little lonelier each time. Good thing those kind of shenanigans are in Russia's distant past, right?
10. Vladamir Putin Will Make You Disappear from Television
And by distant past, we mean 2007. That's when Mikhail Delyagin appeared on the Russian chat show The People Want to Know... or maybe he didn't. Delyagin had made comments critical of Vladimir Putin, the Russian Prime Minister who decided that the people did not, in fact, want to know anything Delaygin had to say.


"Comrades, the truth is the set was merely haunted by the ghost of Vladmir Notorso."

We've all figured out by this point that we view celebrities purely through a lens of cellulite-removal photo retouching. We can hardly blame them. We don't want to see all the nasty warts that (in reality) cover half of Rihanna's face.
But sometimes prettying things up just isn't enough, and that's when things start to get weird. And sleazy.
9. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie too far apart for Star Magazine

Brad and Angelina caught together! And he's totally married to somebody else at the time! They've even got the photo to prove it!
Of course, the magazine is stretching the definition of "together" a little, since Angelina is in Virginia and Brad is in the Caribbean. Still, they're on the same planet, so you know they were totally up to something. The magazine included a disclaimer on page 8 saying the cover was a "composite of two different photographs," proving once and for all that it's OK to lie to sell your magazine as long as you tell everyone the truth in tiny print beneath an unrelated article about Jerry O'Connell's beach house.
Again, we bring up the "if you're going to be Photoshopping anyway... " issue from earlier: Why not have them fucking? Tell us that wouldn't sell some magazines right there.
8. 15-Year-Old Character Too Small-Breasted for Hollywood

Warner Bros. knew that people go see Harry Potter movies for one reason: big ol' titties.
Their problem of course was that the leading lady was the 17-year-old Emma Watson, playing a 15-year-old Hermione Granger. Wait, did we say "problem"? Nothing is a problem when you have Photoshop!
A digital boob job and tummy tuck later, and you've got a busty girl wizard who'll put asses in the seats, dammit! Somebody probably got a raise over that shit.
7. Andy Roddick Too Skinny for Men's Fitness

Hey, the ladies aren't the only ones getting Photoshop boob jobs these days! Look at the pecs on that guy!
In 2007, Men's Fitness ran a feature on how to build big arms. To show off how to build a massive, Arnold Schwarzenegger-esque upper body they used... tennis star Andy Roddick?
Look, Cracked.com doesn't have a corporate tennis team for one reason only: massive, pumped up guns aren't ideal for swinging a racket. That's why Mr. Roddick (real body shown on the right) wasn't ideal for this particular cover. No problem! Crop that head and stick it on the body of some dude with the chest and biceps of the Incredible fucking Hulk!








The darker/supposedly real/natural (but perhaps just more tanned) Beyoncé also looks shopped (perhaps to "prove" the point?). In my memory her skin tone is more brownish, there it looks a bit like those "artificial tan fail" color tones, albeit just a tiny little bit.
ReplyThe harry potter girl's body does not look even real to begin with, at least from these pics. Looks as if they had only the pic of her face and one did her body in a hurry (her hair is also quite different, these are either two photos or there are more photoshop than the boobs). The one with bigger boobs happens to look more realistic though, not because of the cup size, just the lighting. I also feel that it's not so much the boobies that got bigger but her waist that shrank a bit. If these are two photos perhaps she even was just holding her breath or something.
ReplyI think that one "men's health" magazine with Sawyer-from-Lost on the cover also had just his head pasted up someone else's body.
ReplyI don't see too big a deal with the Beyonce picture. I really like the woman and I barely recognized the darker image. She has indeed dyed her hair blonde by now, they didn't do that, and many images and videos of her in bright lighting make her appear fairly fair-skinned. If you see her in-shadow, she's a littler darker. It's a concept that rose in the 1800's, light DOES manipulate the shades of color. I've no doubt they smoothed the skin and all that, but I highly doubt they tried to make her white. :P
ReplyI don't think they tried to make her white/less black, there's a lot of things that can happen from the moment that the pic is taken to how it's eventually considered finished, and looking more white/less black may be just a collateral effect from one or many filters that happened to give a desired look overall, without the person even noticing that she perhaps "should" look more black. But also persons of mixed ancestry also get tanned/darker and fairer without tanning, sometimes their complexion looks just like that of a white person, there are black girls who end up looking like Norah Jones for example (AFAIK not black), like the younger actress who played one of Will Smith's cousins on "fresh prince".
Also with OJ Simpson I don't think they tried to make he look as if he had a darker skin than he has, but just give a grim look to the picture and that was a collateral effect. One got to be a really lousy photoshopper/photomanipulator (even in pre-photoshop times) to intend to have one look darker skinned and end up with that... unless, of course, that's purposefully lousy to allow for the "excuse" of collateral effect so no one uncovers the conspiracy of that white males have against black men and women of any color, at the same time they inflict damage on blacks through subliminal messages such as this...
they photoshopped kiera knightleys chest on the cover of king arthur.
ReplyThat was the best ending line in an article ever...
Replyi would just like to say that in britain, finding a 17-year-old sexually attractive is not a problem since the age of consent is 16.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesSo? In Colombia es 14.
it is somewhat weird if you're over 40.
like the former Italian prime minister and his 16 year older hookers.
It's not a problem anywhere, as long as you don't have sex with them.
Holy shit. Hitler was adorable.
ReplyHe would be cutier with a mustache.
"Cody remains missing in action, despite the joint efforts of GI Joe, the Thundercats and the Millennium Falcon." LOL that was funny!
ReplyMan...the quality really varies greatly from one contributor to another on here doesn't it. Showing your blatant lib-tardness just makes you less funny (if that's at all possible), just how bad do you need approval from others? Sad.
Reply Hide All See All 7 Replies"Waah! I'm a conservative! Just thought you would like to know! Waaah!"
The most predictable thing, and yet they still do it at the drop of a hat.
Both of you really piss me off.
JEFFX13...just how bad do you need approval? How sad.
You're aware this is a comedy site yes? go scream about each others political views on the Fox News forums or something.
you americans and your politics...
Fox News has forums? Wow, that must be the greatest repository of wisdom since the Library of Alexandria burned down.
You should have added that they should have added the forgeries of evolution and climate change, but they won't as they're liberals who will "hide the decline", lol.
My favorite thing about the Hermione digital boob-job is the "SEE IT IN IMAX 3-D" in the retouched one. Wow, IMAX 3-D really does make things spring right out at you!
ReplyI think I woke my neighbors up laughing when I got to "Warner Bros. knew that people go see Harry Potter movies for one reason: big ol' titties."
ReplyBeyonce is just as attractive white as she is black. Daaaaamn
ReplyNumber 8 was crazy. How ridiculous! I am an 18 year old (horny) male and I hardly saw the difference. What an insult to Emma Watson! Frickin' fags.
ReplyI wonder how the magazine issue would look like if OJ was white...(non-racist)(Just Curious)
ReplyThey would have put out a photo of Ron Goldman in a light that made him look black, and marketed it as a hate crime. People killing people without racial tension doesn't sell magazines.
4, 5, and 6. Ah yes, wonderful examples of American racism. Only surpassed by Chinese racism.
ReplyIn Memorium: Cody...
ReplyThe last sentence on #1 was made of pure epic win. : D
ReplyI think the one about Emma Watson is wrong. If you look at the photos, the so called 'unaltered' one looks heaps better then the supposed 'altered'one. Her hair is fuller, the contrast is much nicer and the make up is far more flawless. Also she is a very nicely curved girl in real life and considering she was a 17 year old trying to play a 15 year old I would think it would make more sense to downsize the breasts and take out the waist, so that she'd appear younger.
ReplyWe demand BOOBIES!!!
#7 is some of the worst photoshopping I've seen. I'm not suprised they didn't get away with it.
Reply