5 Facts About Woodstock The Hippies Don't Want You to Know
Forty years ago, half a million people gathered for three days of peace, love and letting their private parts flap all over the hashish-covered mud at a place called Woodstock.
This event exists as mythology for most of our readers, who only know it from a series of photographs and wistful documentaries. So let's take a moment to set a few things straight...

If there's one thing hippies hate, it's war. If there are two things hippies hate, they are war and doing things for profit. If we move the discussion up to three things, they would be war, money and 1980s Latin sensations Menudo, but we don't have time to get into that.

If only there was time.
Knowing that money and the pursuit of it is flower child kryptonite, you may be shocked to learn that the concert that defined the 60s owed its origins to some squares looking to make a buck. And not a buck for Tibet, either. In March of 1968, drugstore heir, John Roberts, and Yale Law grad, Joel Rosenman, placed the following ad in the non-hippiest publications of all time: the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times:
Young men with unlimited capital looking for interesting, legitimate investment opportunities and business propositions.
Since this was before the internet was invented, nobody read the ad with a heavy emphasis on the words "men," "interesting" and "propositions" saving the men from the sort of gay escort service spam that will likely flood the comment section of this article. Instead, Roberts and Rosenman were contacted by Capitol Records exec, Artie Kornfeld, and hippie concert promoter, Michael Lang, with the idea of a starting a music studio in Woodstock, New York. When that idea didn't pan out, the suits struck gold with the notion of a three day art and music festival. Pre-sold tickets would go for $18 (that's $105 in today's money, folks) and latecomers would have to shell out $24 at the gate.

Actual photo of the first planning session.
Despite how that plan eventually worked out (hint: it didn't) the original goal was to make a gigantic buttload of cash off of young, middle-class music lovers. Forming the company Woodstock Ventures, the four got to work at putting together a line-up that would draw enough human cattle to make the men a tidy profit.
They thought they could get 250,000 hippies to show up. At the equivalent of a hundred bucks a ticket, it made for an interesting business opportunity that even a non-man-pimp had to waggle his eyebrows at.

Once the three squares and a little hippie agreed that a three day music fest was the way to get paid, the hunt was on to find a suitable locale. But there was a problem: No one wanted thousands of unwashed, doped up counter-culture ruffians on their property.

Gross.
So the fat cats started making promises. Wacky promises, like that "there would only be 50,000 concert goers" and "they totally knew what they were doing."
In the spring of 1969, Woodstock Ventures leased Mills Industrial Park in Wallkill, New York as the proposed site for the festival. Upon realizing that a place named "Wallkill" was better suited for a three day death metal concert, the people of the town up and passed a "no hippie concerts here" law exactly one month before the festival was supposed to take place.
The official reason for the ban was that town officials had a stinking suspicion that Lang and company hadn't planned their porta-potties properly for the prospective 50,000 people. Undaunted, the fab four kept looking. They were approached by Elliott Tiber from Bethel, New York with the offer of using his 15 acres for the concert. "Too small," they said. So Mr.Tiber put them in touch with one Max Yasgur, a dairy farmer with 600 acres in Bethel. Yasgur agreed to meet with the promoters with the understanding he would be leasing his land for $75,000, once more, for an audience of about 50,000.

That 50,000 number is important. For one, over 150,000 tickets had sold by this point. For two, the promoters had run radio and newspaper ads across the country inviting people to their little hootenanny. They actually expected 250,000 to show up. For three, 250,000 times two came.

But just because it was a bunch of money-grubbing promoters behind the scenes, doesn't change the fact that it was all about changing the world with music, man! After all, guys like the Grateful Dead and Hendrix weren't up there to get paid! Well, now that you mention it...
Several acts, THE WHOse names we won't mention (until a few paragraphs down) refused to take the stage without seeing a flatbed full of cash first.
Woodstock promoters had scrambled to sign big acts through the spring of 1969. Without big names in the line-up, other big names wouldn't bother signing on. They were in a musical pickle, which could also be called a melodious catch-22. Or maybe a harmonic bind. We could do this all day.

This is also a musical pickle.
Their first big break came when Creedence Clearwater Revival signed on for a whopping $10,000 or $11,500, depending on who you ask, in April of 1969. With a total talent budget of $180,000, Michael Lang set a cap of $15,000 for each performer, big or small. This was fine for the likes of Richie Havens, Joan Baez and Janis Freakin' Joplin. Not for Jimi Hendrix, though.
Hendrix wasn't going for that lowball malarkey after scoring $150,000 for a single concert earlier in the summer. Lang ultimately signed Jimi with the promise of a $26,000 payday, twice what any other act was getting. But when the other money-grubbers (Jefferson Airplane) complained, Lang explained that Jimi was actually doing two sets during the festival (SPOILER ALERT: He wasn't. Hendrix's contract stipulated that he closed every show he performed at. Ever.).
And all those lyrics about peace, love and free nachos for all? BALDERDASH. The three biggest acts of the second night (Janis Joplin, The Grateful Dead and The Who) informed Lang and co. at the 11th hour that performing wasn't in the cards until bitches got paid. The Grateful Dead. Seriously. These Pigpen looking, peace spouting, commune dwelling, anti-capitalists wouldn't touch their instruments until cash was in hand:

Mo' Money, mo' problems.
And remember, there were 500,000 hungry, sweaty, dehydrated, mud-caked would-be rioters in the audience. Not keeping the music going could have induced a Lord of the Flies breakdown in civilization out there. So Woodstock Ventures emptied their pockets and discovered their pooled resources amounted to $1.25, three LSD tabs, an orange rind and Grace Slick's fake phone number.

The panicky promoters begged a local banker to put up the money, based on the fact that Richie Rich Roberts had a $1,000,000 trust fund he could use as collateral. Mr. Banker said, "Cool," and proceeded to get in his car and drive to the bank, which would have been hella easy since this is what the roads looked like up to 10 miles away from the concert:

Yet somehow, he did. Mr. Banker made it to the bank, counted cash on hand, kindly accepted Robert's personal check for "50 or 100 thousand dollars." Only that kept the "three days of peace, love and music" from grinding to a silent halt as the bands went on strike, mid-concert.








Yeah but Limp Bizkit totally rocked it!!!
ReplyI wish I could go back in time to woostock. I'd be the guy running the Army recruitment booth.
ReplyAlso, I could invest in Microsoft and Google and make a ton of money.
Would I have gone to Woodstock just to hear Sha Na Na? Yes, of course I would have gone to Woodstock just to hear Sha Na Na. Don't be ridiculous.
ReplyShittiest article ever. Go stick your tongue up Rush Limbaugh's ass, cocksucker.
ReplyThat is a weird, weird way to insult Kristi, especially based on this article. It's not about politics. Can you seriously look at these facts and still think only a square could object to Woodstock?
he called you a square, dude...
Woodstock wad pretty bad, but not nearly so much as Burning Man, which gets more blatantly greedy every year. They charge hippies hundreds of dollars to come spent a few days in the middle of some desert wasteland, and not only do they refuse to provide even the most basic services like latrines or drinking water, but they try to pass it off as some ethically motivated Eco-friendly
ReplyEco-friendly what!? I'm on the edge of my seat here
Yeah I almost took a pilgrimage out there but of course after doing a little research I found out about much of what you're saying. I need to stop looking behind those curtains. (Wizard of Oz reference)
One thing that occurred to me after reading the last part:
ReplyWoodstock--three deaths.
Altamont--one death.
Woodstock--allegedly the greatest moment in the lives of 500,000 people.
Altamont--the end of the '60s, the most horrible event since the Holocaust, or the last time anybody ever had any fun, depending on which old-school rock critic you ask.
What made the difference in the public eye? Is it just because the Altamont death was caught on camera?
how are you even comparing the two? First of all there were several deaths at Altamont, secondly the death you talked about is just marinated in controversey. The dude allegedly tried to attack the band with a gun, the Stones hired the HA to be their security (that'll never happen again) and they killed him in the line of duty. It wasn't a death it was a fucked up occurrence.
The first couple made me sad...but the ending was hilarious! XD Nice article.
ReplySuper article. On a 40th anniversary documentary about it I think I heard one of the producers say they eventually turned a profit out of it, many years later. Probably due to the albums and the film. I'm sure it was hard on everyone who was there, but the film is still fun to watch, and the performance by The Who of "See Me, Feel Me" is one of my favorites of any song, ever.
ReplyI don't see how any of this reflects on the actual hippies. Why would the attendees of this thing not want you to know that the organizers fucked up? The only thing that might reflect on the hippies is that the bands wanted a lot of money, but then again, the band members aren't necessarily actual hippies either.
ReplyIt reflects on them in the form of blissful adolescent ignorance.
and the chaos of a poorly planned event seems totally hippie s**t
They forgot the rape or my skimming is incorrect. Supposedly some chick was ganged raped at the OG woodstock.
ReplyFrom what I've learned about Woodstock, they could just take that one event and make an entire class out of it. It was just one giant clusterfuck of drugs, music, hippies, and all the f**k in the world not being given.
ReplyI'm sad I missed out on it. I was born a few years too late.
Kind of a crappy article. Should be called 5 Slightly Controversial Facts About Woodstock You Don't Really Care About.
Replywell the bands demanding more money seems like pertinent info, they're supposed to be the icons of this thing and they're just pricks
Hippies
ReplyInteresting. I'm so used to Woodstock being almost deified in music history.
Replystill sounds awesome
ReplyMay I also include the HVAC problem, as I attended Woodstock?
ReplyThe weather was HOT, there wasn't a breath of wind, and the air got real stale in a natural amphitheater with a couple hundred thousand breathing people.
They started using helicopters as ceiling fans. Choppers ferrying acts in and out would do three passes over the crowd to circulate air. It worked. I still remember Janis Joplin waving from the side door overhead.
You inspired me to invent a helicopter ceiling fan. After my first million made, I'll send you a check for $10,000.
I'm pretty sure that every documentary I've watched on Woodstock, has included these topics
Reply"Occupy Wall Street" is just Woodstock without the bands.
ReplyIf by that you mean the majority being ripped off, and their safety disregarded, by a small number of rich people, then: ABSOLUTELY!
I like the thumbs down with no reply... probably came from JimNepa himself...
I didn't know anything about the business end of Woodstock. That's some bold s**t they pulled. Awesome article.
Replykristi sucks
ReplyYou suck
Problem, hippie?