5 Facts About Woodstock The Hippies Don't Want You to Know
Forty years ago, half a million people gathered for three days of peace, love and letting their private parts flap all over the hashish-covered mud at a place called Woodstock.
This event exists as mythology for most of our readers, who only know it from a series of photographs and wistful documentaries. So let's take a moment to set a few things straight...

If there's one thing hippies hate, it's war. If there are two things hippies hate, they are war and doing things for profit. If we move the discussion up to three things, they would be war, money and 1980s Latin sensations Menudo, but we don't have time to get into that.

If only there was time.
Knowing that money and the pursuit of it is flower child kryptonite, you may be shocked to learn that the concert that defined the 60s owed its origins to some squares looking to make a buck. And not a buck for Tibet, either. In March of 1968, drugstore heir, John Roberts, and Yale Law grad, Joel Rosenman, placed the following ad in the non-hippiest publications of all time: the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times:
Young men with unlimited capital looking for interesting, legitimate investment opportunities and business propositions.
Since this was before the internet was invented, nobody read the ad with a heavy emphasis on the words "men," "interesting" and "propositions" saving the men from the sort of gay escort service spam that will likely flood the comment section of this article. Instead, Roberts and Rosenman were contacted by Capitol Records exec, Artie Kornfeld, and hippie concert promoter, Michael Lang, with the idea of a starting a music studio in Woodstock, New York. When that idea didn't pan out, the suits struck gold with the notion of a three day art and music festival. Pre-sold tickets would go for $18 (that's $105 in today's money, folks) and latecomers would have to shell out $24 at the gate.

Actual photo of the first planning session.
Despite how that plan eventually worked out (hint: it didn't) the original goal was to make a gigantic buttload of cash off of young, middle-class music lovers. Forming the company Woodstock Ventures, the four got to work at putting together a line-up that would draw enough human cattle to make the men a tidy profit.
They thought they could get 250,000 hippies to show up. At the equivalent of a hundred bucks a ticket, it made for an interesting business opportunity that even a non-man-pimp had to waggle his eyebrows at.

Once the three squares and a little hippie agreed that a three day music fest was the way to get paid, the hunt was on to find a suitable locale. But there was a problem: No one wanted thousands of unwashed, doped up counter-culture ruffians on their property.

Gross.
So the fat cats started making promises. Wacky promises, like that "there would only be 50,000 concert goers" and "they totally knew what they were doing."
In the spring of 1969, Woodstock Ventures leased Mills Industrial Park in Wallkill, New York as the proposed site for the festival. Upon realizing that a place named "Wallkill" was better suited for a three day death metal concert, the people of the town up and passed a "no hippie concerts here" law exactly one month before the festival was supposed to take place.
The official reason for the ban was that town officials had a stinking suspicion that Lang and company hadn't planned their porta-potties properly for the prospective 50,000 people. Undaunted, the fab four kept looking. They were approached by Elliott Tiber from Bethel, New York with the offer of using his 15 acres for the concert. "Too small," they said. So Mr.Tiber put them in touch with one Max Yasgur, a dairy farmer with 600 acres in Bethel. Yasgur agreed to meet with the promoters with the understanding he would be leasing his land for $75,000, once more, for an audience of about 50,000.

That 50,000 number is important. For one, over 150,000 tickets had sold by this point. For two, the promoters had run radio and newspaper ads across the country inviting people to their little hootenanny. They actually expected 250,000 to show up. For three, 250,000 times two came.

But just because it was a bunch of money-grubbing promoters behind the scenes, doesn't change the fact that it was all about changing the world with music, man! After all, guys like the Grateful Dead and Hendrix weren't up there to get paid! Well, now that you mention it...
Several acts, THE WHOse names we won't mention (until a few paragraphs down) refused to take the stage without seeing a flatbed full of cash first.
Woodstock promoters had scrambled to sign big acts through the spring of 1969. Without big names in the line-up, other big names wouldn't bother signing on. They were in a musical pickle, which could also be called a melodious catch-22. Or maybe a harmonic bind. We could do this all day.

This is also a musical pickle.
Their first big break came when Creedence Clearwater Revival signed on for a whopping $10,000 or $11,500, depending on who you ask, in April of 1969. With a total talent budget of $180,000, Michael Lang set a cap of $15,000 for each performer, big or small. This was fine for the likes of Richie Havens, Joan Baez and Janis Freakin' Joplin. Not for Jimi Hendrix, though.
Hendrix wasn't going for that lowball malarkey after scoring $150,000 for a single concert earlier in the summer. Lang ultimately signed Jimi with the promise of a $26,000 payday, twice what any other act was getting. But when the other money-grubbers (Jefferson Airplane) complained, Lang explained that Jimi was actually doing two sets during the festival (SPOILER ALERT: He wasn't. Hendrix's contract stipulated that he closed every show he performed at. Ever.).
And all those lyrics about peace, love and free nachos for all? BALDERDASH. The three biggest acts of the second night (Janis Joplin, The Grateful Dead and The Who) informed Lang and co. at the 11th hour that performing wasn't in the cards until bitches got paid. The Grateful Dead. Seriously. These Pigpen looking, peace spouting, commune dwelling, anti-capitalists wouldn't touch their instruments until cash was in hand:

Mo' Money, mo' problems.
And remember, there were 500,000 hungry, sweaty, dehydrated, mud-caked would-be rioters in the audience. Not keeping the music going could have induced a Lord of the Flies breakdown in civilization out there. So Woodstock Ventures emptied their pockets and discovered their pooled resources amounted to $1.25, three LSD tabs, an orange rind and Grace Slick's fake phone number.

The panicky promoters begged a local banker to put up the money, based on the fact that Richie Rich Roberts had a $1,000,000 trust fund he could use as collateral. Mr. Banker said, "Cool," and proceeded to get in his car and drive to the bank, which would have been hella easy since this is what the roads looked like up to 10 miles away from the concert:

Yet somehow, he did. Mr. Banker made it to the bank, counted cash on hand, kindly accepted Robert's personal check for "50 or 100 thousand dollars." Only that kept the "three days of peace, love and music" from grinding to a silent halt as the bands went on strike, mid-concert.








Don't take the Brown Acid...it's err...not Acid.
ReplyThis info is pretty well known.
ReplyWoodstock sucked a penis, everyone knows Monterey Pop was where it was at ;)
ReplyI hate listening to people i know wish they could have been around for Woodstock.Maybe i sound like a "square" if say this but if i want to hang around with a bunch of stoners and listen to a few s****y bands i'll go back to high school.
ReplyI play the musical pickle.
ReplyWe heard it was the skinflute
festivals these days are still awesome and it only takes an hour to take a piss!
ReplyDid anyone else think of That 70's Show when they saw the kids in the second pic of #5?
ReplySour grapes. What does your generation have, watching American Idol on TV and then tweeting about it to each other? You missed some really fun s**t, and your young modern life sucks.You should get pissed off and take it back, your own freedom I mean, and stop making excuses for turning into republicans.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesHypocritical, much? One word, Boomer: ALTAMONT.
Actually, here's a bunch more words, which reflect what your generation gave the world: Quaaludes, polyester leisure suits, the SDS, Symbionese Liberation Army, avocado-green appliances, Charles Manson, the Chevy Vega, Tom Hayden, tie-dye clothing, cocaine as a status symbol, Ronald Reagan's political career, Fleetwood Mac, and music produced by Jacques Morali.
Drop the delusions, fogey. Pop culture sucked in the 1960s just as much as it does today. Jimi Hendrix never made the charts... but The Archies did. And ain't it a shame that current television doesn't reach the oh-so-high standards set by Laugh-In and The Beverley Hillbillies?
Oh, and one last quick question. If the 'Woodstock Generation' was so damn wise and powerful, why was Richard Nixon a two-term president? I've always wondered about that.
Right on DeadLenny...
"If the 'Woodstock Generation' was so damn wise and powerful, why was Richard Nixon a two-term president?"
Well, for one, which party got us into Vietnam, and brought back the military draft? (Hint: not Nixon's.)
Wow, DeadLenny. Way to blame one subculture for everything bad that happened in two decades. I don't have time to go down everything in your list, but the reason Nixon was elected twice was that Woodstock-era activists weren't in the majority. Remember the whole "Silent Majority" thing. And hippies weren't the ones listening to The Archies and watching The Beverly Hillbillies.
Man, I was about to say touche to Art, but then Lenny totally ran him over with his hippie tractor. LOL
Every generation has a lot to pretend never happened. Art's generation definitely trumps today's generation on music (fortunately for me, I grew up in the 70s and 80s). However, Hendrix never charted because hippies spent what little money they panhandled on LSD and not records. Or food. Or soap.
Definitely a low blow on Nixon. JFK/LBJ/Nixon is just like Bush/Obama. Don't blame the president's party that we're at war.
That's why I dress as Travis Bickle. I don't have to answer for anyone else's bullshit.
I have no idea why the advertisement I got for this article was "the kinekt gear ring". but I've watched their promotional video about 5 times now and all I can say is SORCERY!
ReplyDoesn't make me love the concert or the bands there any less.
ReplyI still would have gone.
ReplyNone of this is news, so I don't get the point of the article...
ReplyBeing that this is not a news site...derp much?
GODDAMN HIPPIES!
ReplyYeah but Limp Bizkit totally rocked it!!!
ReplyPlease tell me you're trolling.
I wish I could go back in time to woostock. I'd be the guy running the Army recruitment booth.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesAlso, I could invest in Microsoft and Google and make a ton of money.
Or you could lead to their demise and keep your soul.
f**k my soul! What has that piece of s**t ever done for me?
And put a buttload of money on the Jets.
Would I have gone to Woodstock just to hear Sha Na Na? Yes, of course I would have gone to Woodstock just to hear Sha Na Na. Don't be ridiculous.
ReplyShittiest article ever. Go stick your tongue up Rush Limbaugh's ass, cocksucker.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesThat is a weird, weird way to insult Kristi, especially based on this article. It's not about politics. Can you seriously look at these facts and still think only a square could object to Woodstock?
he called you a square, dude...
From a proud Progressive - this article is factual. Carry on.
I hate Rush too, but that's not what this article was about. Kristi isn't using the term "hippie" in the same way Rush does. She's using it in reference to the counterculture of the 60s.
Woodstock wad pretty bad, but not nearly so much as Burning Man, which gets more blatantly greedy every year. They charge hippies hundreds of dollars to come spent a few days in the middle of some desert wasteland, and not only do they refuse to provide even the most basic services like latrines or drinking water, but they try to pass it off as some ethically motivated Eco-friendly
ReplyEco-friendly what!? I'm on the edge of my seat here
Yeah I almost took a pilgrimage out there but of course after doing a little research I found out about much of what you're saying. I need to stop looking behind those curtains. (Wizard of Oz reference)
One thing that occurred to me after reading the last part:
ReplyWoodstock--three deaths.
Altamont--one death.
Woodstock--allegedly the greatest moment in the lives of 500,000 people.
Altamont--the end of the '60s, the most horrible event since the Holocaust, or the last time anybody ever had any fun, depending on which old-school rock critic you ask.
What made the difference in the public eye? Is it just because the Altamont death was caught on camera?
how are you even comparing the two? First of all there were several deaths at Altamont, secondly the death you talked about is just marinated in controversey. The dude allegedly tried to attack the band with a gun, the Stones hired the HA to be their security (that'll never happen again) and they killed him in the line of duty. It wasn't a death it was a fucked up occurrence.
@Constructicon Yeah, I saw "Gimme Shelter," too. :)) I'm not saying that Altamont wasn't fucked-up occurrence, but there were some things about Woodstock that were pretty fucked-up, too. The perspective just seems off to me.
The first couple made me sad...but the ending was hilarious! XD Nice article.
Reply