The 5 Most Horrific Ways People Have Tried to Discourage Sex
About 95 percent of everything males have ever done has been with one goal in mind: to impress the ladies and hopefully get one of them to touch their wiener. But parallel to that runs an alternate universe of people whose entire goal is to stop themselves or others from having sex.
How far would they go? Horribly, disgustingly far. No, some of this is not for the faint of heart.

Male infibulation is the technical term for a procedure that basically wires your dick shut to prevent sex or masturbation. It was usually done by pulling the foreskin over the head of the penis and clamping it to the other side using a metal ring or stitches. Wait, was this something they did on purpose, or was it like a fraternity prank they pulled on passed-out dudes?

And... how do you take a leak?
Who Did It (and What in God's Name was Wrong with Them)?
In Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, the last thing a slave owner wanted was to have his slaves fornicating and masturbating when they could be out picking grapes or being killed by lions for entertainment. Thanks to infibulations their penises were rendered useless as it kept them from even thinking about sex since just getting a semi chub would have hurt like hell.
The practice branched beyond the slave trade towards the fine arts as well. Greeks and Romans enjoyed their live shows but hated big, floppy cock head. This was an issue since most public performances were done in the nude. The solution? Rather than something sensible like tiny hats or a fig leaf; musicians, athletes and comedians opted to do the least logical thing possible and infibulated themselves. Thus the head was obscured allowing for the modesty of these ancient cultures to not be tarnished as they made their way to the state-run orgy.

A tradition that lives on today.
Then in the 1870s, masturbation became a popular scapegoat for most forms of physical and mental anguish such as insanity and epilepsy--which makes sense if you think about all the times you jerk yourself into a fit of seizures. A Welsh physician named David Yellowlees thought he would set up shop as a male infibulator in an effort to stop these masturbators.
While this sounds like almost as bad of a business venture as pets.com, Yellowlees actually found himself with a number of volunteers for the procedure. We're going to guess they were responding to some ads with very unclear wording.

A chastity belt is a harness that is made to fit around the waist, blocking access to the naughty parts, thus preventing sex. Kinda like wearing a Star Trek belt.

Who Did It (and What in God's Name was Wrong with Them)?
The chastity belt is by far the most romanticized and exaggerated of all the sexual suppressing devices, and romanticizing a rusty crotch locker is harder than you'd think.
They have often been portrayed as elegant devices voluntarily worn by a devoted if insatiably horny and untrustworthy wife waiting for her husband to return from the crusades. In reality they tend to look pretty horrifying.

Jesus. Are those teeth?
Outside of a few rare cases, chastity belts were typically used as a measure of self-defense against medieval crotch warfare rather than as a means to subjugate women. The term "chastity belt" has been used since the Crusades in a metaphorical way to mean the chaste vows between a man and wife, but the literal metal cooch barrier is much rarer.
The first recorded usage of an actual chastity belt was in Florence in 1405 on what we assume was a slow news day.

The use of chastity belts to prevent consensual sex did not exist until the 1700s and lasted until about 1930. They were typically fitted on teen girls in order to keep them virgins until marriage. It was also handy to keep them from masturbating, which of course was a leading cause of infertility and demonic possession of the vulva.
The only other area that chastity belts have found a sex-preventative use was in England, in the 19th century, as a way to avoid sexual harassment in the workplace. From this we can assume that 150 years ago, men were a lot more direct with their sexual harassment, apparently opting to forgo a "your tits look great in that sweater" morning greeting for some surprise coitus by the water cooler.


History teaches us that virgins are valuable, if for no other reason than angry volcano gods all seem to find them delicious.
The perceived benefits to a prospective husband would lead to larger dowries and the chance to marry a wealthier man. Hell, the British Royal Family blatantly came out and said that the "virginal status" of Diana Spencer was a huge factor in their selection of her to marry Prince Charles. But all of this amounts to nothing if we have fake virgins running about all willy nilly. Someone needed to devise a test to make sure.

We'll check. With our dongs.
Who Did It (and What in God's Name was Wrong with Them)?
The basic virginity test was proof of a hymen. Old timey people used to prove a bride's status as a virgin by displaying the bloodied wedding sheets the day after the marriage (though that also seems like it could be the sign of a chastity belt penis mauling). Yes, nothing shows your husband that you love him more than flying your hymen sheets at his in-laws house for a few weeks.
Another type of virginity test used in some parts of Africa involved a group of women deemed "virginity testers," who would examine girls of marital age and determine if they were virginal or not. Brides-to-be that were declared certified, grade A virgins were not only worth the extra dowry, but came with the bonus knowledge that they'd been groped by a group of creepy old ladies. Sometimes the exam consisted of a search for a hymen, sort of a vaginated Where's Waldo, but other times it would be determined by the sound of the woman's urine stream, as it's well known that brazen hussies have very splashy pee.

"Mom, Cynthia pees just like a whore."
Speaking of urine, another type of virginity test was put forth in Pliny the Elder's History of the World, in which he claimed to have invented a virgin potion. All a woman had to do was drink it and then not whiz. He believed that the more sex a woman had, the shorter amount of time she could hold her pee. Remember this next time you are at the bar and see a girl going to the restroom every 10 minutes.








Those were my balls, and I really liked 'em. Imagine what I would do to you if you ever piss me off.
ReplyNone of those sounds worse than frontal lobotomy (which used to be a "treatment" for homosexuality during McCarthy era).
ReplyThat chastity belt has a fanged butt hole hole, too. The poop came out in pretty designs like Playdo.
ReplyMale circumcision was originally pushed by Dr. Kellogg (the cornflake guy) to prevent masturbation. Yet here we are in the year 2012...
ReplyWell the 'women who have sex more often have to pee more often' is kind of true, in an indirect way: The more often a woman has sex, the more likely she is to get a bladder infection because the bacteria introduced to the opening of the urethra from the penis... But it's not a direct cause and effect situation.
ReplyHow about the African practice of sewing vaginas shut? That seems worse than anything here and it's still going on in some places.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesworse than essentially stapling a penis to its self? um no. equally as bad? yes. worse? no.
iam sure people will dislike what i have to day. plain and simple though, keep your tools away from other peoples groins!
don't forget they also remove the clitoris
Yes, they like to saw off all the sensitive lady bits with rusty blades and stitch everything up, leaving her unable to ever enjoy sex and to suffer pain during intercourse forever. Sounds like its pretty bad.
Life is lonely and sometimes even boring. You may need a fresh thing
Replyto excite your mind 《Cougarchats,C om 》 is a popular cougar dating
site that makes your online dating journey fun and exciting. The cougars
and young men at 《Cougarchats,C om 》 are seeking for friendship, dates, romance and even marriage.
Pretty good list, bu def not the "most" w/o FGM, which is pretty horrific, too- sewing shut vaginas, cutting off clits- *shudder". fun read tho.
ReplyForced to wear a shirt that had a tick written on it for every time I fap eh?
ReplyId wear that s**t with pride. Hell, a shirt wouldnt be big enough, id need a cape dragging to the floor like kings wear to hold a perfect record of my fap sessions.
They shall call me...THE FAPARCH
At this point, people would probably just think I was wearing a solid black shirt.
"We assume the session consisted of the long silences interrupted by the doctor shaking his head and saying, "Dude... " every five minutes or so." LOL I can totally see this in my head.
ReplyI see that Cracked forgot my favorite: telling kids that they will burn in the eternal fires of Hell if they have sex before marriage.
ReplyVERY true :P
Not everyone bleeds their first time...at least I didn't. I guess back then I would have been screwed when my in laws saw my unbloodied sheets and they mistakenly thought I was a whore. That's a crappy way to judge something like that. Even if a girl does bleed, it may not be enough to actually bloody the sheets. I'd bet there were a lot of screwed over pissed off virgins back then.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesKeep in mind that these were times where a woman can be executed "or tested" for being a witch just because someone accuesed them, there was a lot of injustice to woman in those days. Seems like it would be easy to produce some blood in other ways just to trick the inlaws, like say punch your new wife in the face.
I think the lack of bleeding has something to do with women today being more physically fit and having a better diet than in the past, but I am not completely sure.
wearing tampons can break the hymen so hey, you could be tried as a whore without having had sex
I don't know about you guys, but if I saw a guy or chick walking around with a Star Trek belt buckle I'd bone them in an instant. Just saying.
ReplySame here... especially TOS.
What's 4 times a day for ten years equal?
ReplyI'd say it's bigger than the aeroplane banner ...
approximatley 14,600
Female circumcision!
ReplyBut that doesn't stop them from having sex. Just enjoying it.
Yeah, but why do it if it's not enjoyable? Plus it sounds really painful.
But eventually there would be so many tics my shirt would be all one colour! Hang on, would different coloured tics start popping up? but even still wouldn't there come a point where there'd just be too many tics and it'd just look like a load of lin-
ReplyI seriously fap too much
You Brits, with the "colours" of your "T-shurts"
The "Mom, Cynthia pees just like a whore" line was hilarious! I literally fell off my chair laughing!
ReplyOh my. "Milky way in an army full of Snickers". That is just impossibly clever.
ReplySo, I'm going to be devil's advocate here and say; Why is Circumcision so bad? I was circumcised, and I don't really care. It hasn't put a raincloud over my head 24/7, and I could be having a good night's rest every night if Skyrim didn't say otherwise.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesI've talked with others about this, a lot of females too. The general consensus from them is that natural ones look a bit gross.
Thank you.
It's not the end of the world but as it doesn't get any less painful in adulthood, why not let everyone choose for themselves?
edit: I meant more painful, oops
1. Some people HAVE to get circumcised as adults. The foreskin doesn't always grow at the same rate as the rest of the penis.
2. There's a correlation between cervical cancer and having a foreskin, due to smegma.
Circumcision isn't a horrible thing. It just makes sex less pleasant for both you and your partner, because fundamentally you've removed 60% of the skin from something which has that much skin for a reason, said reason being to make mating more pleasant so you'll do it more often.
Most notably, an intact penis makes female orgasm during penetration FAR more likely, and the general consensus about THAT is "who gives a flying leap at a rolling donut how it LOOKS."
I personally find uncircumcised ones very disgusting, and would never be able to tell the difference in feeling between either.
I like them natural. My last serious boyfriend's was like a nuclear submarine - very large, very streamlined and smooth, resulting in a truly apocalyptic explosion affecting all concerned parties.
The reason circumcision is seen as "natural" is because of a circumcision craze somewhere around the 80's. Thankfully, my parents didn't buy into this thus I have mine intact. It also helps that in this country, circumcised people are the exception rather than the rule.
Dude... why is genital mutilation presented here as less horrific than making fun of a skank?
ReplyMaybe you don't understand (thus your use of the term s***k for any woman who dares to have sex outside of marriage) but making consensual, healthy sex the end-all be-all of women's sexuality is pretty damn awful. I don't know if it is worse than genital mutilation but I would be willing to argue that it is, a). just as bad and b). happens because of the same societal pressures.